Thompson Henry J, Brick Mark A
Cancer Prevention Laboratory and
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Adv Nutr. 2016 Jul 15;7(4):623-6. doi: 10.3945/an.115.009696. Print 2016 Jul.
An important gap exists between the daily amounts of fiber recommended in the human diet (28-42 g/d) and that which is actually consumed (median intake, 12-14 g/d). In fact, <5% of Americans meet the recommended intake for dietary fiber, and the magnitude of the gap is large, approximately a 50-70% shortfall. Because considerable evidence indicates that dietary fiber affects normal physiologic function and the onset of chronic diseases and their progression, the fiber gap represents an opportune target at which dietary interventions can be directed. This perspective considers whether a scientific basis exists for the current lack of emphasis on pulse crops, that is, grain legumes (common bean, chickpea, lentils, and garden pea) as a concentrated, inexpensive, and widely available source of dietary fiber. Attention is directed to this topic because the fiber gap has existed for decades with little improvement despite nutrition labeling, consumer education about the value of whole-grain cereal crop-based products, and the introduction of many fiber-enriched foods. The time is long overdue to identify additional approaches that have the potential to close the dietary fiber gap. To this end, the potential role of pulse crops in remediating this gap is examined.
人类饮食中建议的每日纤维摄入量(28 - 42克/天)与实际摄入量(中位数摄入量为12 - 14克/天)之间存在重大差距。事实上,不到5%的美国人达到了膳食纤维的建议摄入量,而且差距很大,大约短缺50 - 70%。由于大量证据表明膳食纤维会影响正常生理功能以及慢性病的发生和发展,纤维摄入量差距是饮食干预可以针对的一个合适目标。本文探讨是否存在科学依据来解释目前为何不重视豆类作物,即谷物豆类(普通豆、鹰嘴豆、小扁豆和豌豆)作为一种浓缩、廉价且广泛可得的膳食纤维来源。关注这个话题是因为尽管有营养标签、消费者对全谷物谷类作物产品价值的教育以及许多富含纤维的食品的推出,但纤维摄入量差距已经存在数十年,几乎没有改善。早就应该确定其他有可能缩小膳食纤维差距的方法了。为此,本文研究了豆类作物在弥补这一差距方面的潜在作用。