Charlton-Ouw Kristofer M, Sandhu Harleen K, Leake Samuel S, Jeffress Katherine, Miller Charles C, Durham Christopher A, Nguyen Tom C, Estrera Anthony L, Safi Hazim J, Azizzadeh Ali
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX; Memorial Hermann Heart & Vascular Institute, Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) can cause limb ischemia due to branch vessel occlusion. A minority of patients have persistent ischemia after central aortic repair and require peripheral arterial revascularization. We investigated whether the need for limb revascularization is associated with adverse outcomes.
We reviewed our cases of AAD from 2000 to 2014 and identified patients with malperfusion syndromes (coronary, cerebral, spinal, visceral, renal, or peripheral ischemia). Patients with DeBakey I/II (Stanford type A) dissection had urgent open repair of the ascending aorta. Patients with DeBakey III (Stanford type B) dissection were initiated on anti-impulse medical therapy and had either open aortic repair or thoracic endovascular aortic repair for malperfusion syndromes. Patients with persistent lower limb ischemia after aortic repair usually had either extra-anatomic bypass grafting or iliac stenting. Some DeBakey III patients had peripheral revascularization without central aortic repair. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine the effects of need for limb revascularization and clinical outcomes.
We treated 1,015 AAD patients (501 [49.4%] DeBakey I/II and 514 [50.6%] DeBakey III) with a mean age of 59.7 ± 14.5 years (67.5% males). Aortic repair was performed in all DeBakey I/II patients and in 103 (20.0%) DeBakey III patients. Overall 30-day mortality was 11.3%. Lower limb ischemia was present in 104 (10.3%) patients and was more common in DeBakey I/II compared with DeBakey III dissections (65.4% vs. 34.6%; odds ratio [OR] 2.1, confidence interval [CI] 1.4-3.2; P = 0.001). Among the 40 patients who required limb revascularization, there was no difference in need for revascularization between DeBakey I/II and III patients. Patients requiring limb revascularization were more likely to have mesenteric ischemia compared with the rest of the cohort in both DeBakey I/II (P = 0.037) and DeBakey III dissections (P < 0.001) with worse 10-year survival (21.9 % vs. 59.2%, P < 0.001). When adjusted for other malperfusion syndromes, patients with limb revascularization had similar long-term survival compared to uncomplicated dissection patients (P = 0.960).
Patients requiring lower limb revascularization after treatment for AAD are more likely to have mesenteric ischemia and worse survival. The need for limb revascularization is a marker for more extensive dissection and should prompt evaluation for visceral malperfusion.
急性主动脉夹层(AAD)可因分支血管阻塞导致肢体缺血。少数患者在进行主动脉中央修复后仍存在持续性缺血,需要进行外周动脉血运重建。我们研究了肢体血运重建的需求是否与不良预后相关。
我们回顾了2000年至2014年期间的AAD病例,确定患有灌注不良综合征(冠状动脉、脑、脊髓、内脏、肾脏或外周缺血)的患者。患有DeBakey I/II型(斯坦福A型)夹层的患者紧急进行升主动脉开放修复。患有DeBakey III型(斯坦福B型)夹层的患者开始接受抗搏动药物治疗,并针对灌注不良综合征进行开放主动脉修复或胸主动脉腔内修复。主动脉修复后仍存在持续性下肢缺血的患者通常进行解剖外旁路移植术或髂动脉支架置入术。一些DeBakey III型患者在未进行主动脉中央修复的情况下进行了外周血运重建。我们进行了单因素和多因素分析,以确定肢体血运重建需求和临床结果的影响。
我们治疗了1015例AAD患者(501例[49.4%]为DeBakey I/II型,514例[50.6%]为DeBakey III型),平均年龄59.7±14.5岁(男性占67.5%)。所有DeBakey I/II型患者和103例(20.0%)DeBakey III型患者均进行了主动脉修复。总体30天死亡率为11.3%。104例(10.3%)患者存在下肢缺血,与DeBakey III型夹层相比,在DeBakey I/II型中更常见(65.4%对34.6%;优势比[OR]2.1,置信区间[CI]1.4 - 3.2;P = 0.001)。在需要肢体血运重建的40例患者中,DeBakey I/II型和III型患者在血运重建需求上没有差异。与其余队列相比,需要肢体血运重建的患者在DeBakey I/II型(P = 0.037)和DeBakey III型夹层(P < 0.001)中更易发生肠系膜缺血,10年生存率更差(21.9%对59.2%,P < 0.001)。在对其他灌注不良综合征进行校正后,与未合并并发症的夹层患者相比,需要肢体血运重建的患者长期生存率相似(P = 0.960)。
AAD治疗后需要下肢血运重建的患者更易发生肠系膜缺血且生存率更差。肢体血运重建的需求是更广泛夹层的一个标志,应促使对内脏灌注不良进行评估。