Chandna Shahid M, Carpenter Lewis, Da Silva-Gane Maria, Warwicker Paul, Greenwood Roger N, Farrington Ken
Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Nephron. 2016;134(2):64-72. doi: 10.1159/000447784. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
In elderly, dependent patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, dialysis may confer only a small survival advantage over conservative kidney management (CKM). We investigated the role of rate of decline of kidney function on treatment choices and survival.
We identified a retrospective (1995-2010) cohort of patients aged over 75 years, with progressive kidney impairment and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 10 and 15 ml/min/1.73 m2. All subsequently chose to be treated by either dialysis or CKM. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years.
Of 250 patients identified, 92 (37%) opted for dialysis and 158 (63%) for CKM. Mean age was 80.9 ± 4.0 years. eGFR was 13.3 ± 1.4 initially and 8.7 ± 3.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 at follow-up. Both were similar in those on dialysis and CKM pathways. Rate of decline of eGFR was more rapid in those choosing dialysis (0.45 (interquartile range, IQR 0.64) vs. 0.21 (IQR 0.28) ml/min/1.73 m2/month, p < 0.001), and independently predicted choice of CKM. In patients with high comorbidity, choice of dialysis was associated with a non-significant adjusted survival advantage of 5 months. Inclusion in models of time dependent eGFR during follow-up (eGFRtd) - a reflection of the rate of decline of kidney function - showed it to be independently associated with mortality risk in those on the CKM (p < 0.001) but not on the dialysis pathway. CKM pathway patients at the 25th centile of eGFRtd had an adjusted survival of 7 months compared to 63 months for those at the 75th centile.
Rate of decline of kidney function is a determinant of CKM choice in elderly patients and is associated with mortality risk in patients of the CKM pathway. These findings should inform counselling.
在老年、依赖他人护理的晚期慢性肾脏病患者中,透析相比保守肾脏管理(CKM)可能仅具有微小的生存优势。我们研究了肾功能下降速率在治疗选择和生存方面的作用。
我们确定了一个回顾性队列(1995 - 2010年),其中患者年龄超过75岁,患有进行性肾脏损害,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)在10至15毫升/分钟/1.73平方米之间。所有患者随后选择接受透析或CKM治疗。对患者进行了至少3年的随访。
在确定的250例患者中,92例(37%)选择透析,158例(63%)选择CKM。平均年龄为80.9±4.0岁。初始eGFR为13.3±1.4,随访时为8.7±3.0毫升/分钟/1.73平方米。透析组和CKM组患者的这些指标相似。选择透析的患者eGFR下降速率更快(0.45(四分位间距,IQR 0.64)对0.21(IQR 0.28)毫升/分钟/1.73平方米/月,p<0.001),并且独立预测了CKM的选择。在高合并症患者中,选择透析与5个月的非显著调整生存优势相关。将随访期间的时间依赖性eGFR(eGFRtd)纳入模型——反映肾功能下降速率——显示其与CKM组患者的死亡风险独立相关(p<0.001),但与透析组无关。处于eGFRtd第25百分位的CKM组患者调整后生存时间为7个月,而处于第75百分位的患者为63个月。
肾功能下降速率是老年患者选择CKM的一个决定因素,并且与CKM组患者的死亡风险相关。这些发现应为咨询提供依据。