Hinchcliff Reece, Greenfield David, Hogden Anne, Sarrami-Foroushani Pooria, Travaglia Joanne, Braithwaite Jeffrey
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Oct;28(5):561-565. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw074. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
To examine how consumer engagement (CE) can be promoted through Australian accreditation programmes.
A nation-wide qualitative study completed in 2012.
All eight Australian States and Territories.
Two-hundred and fifty-eight healthcare stakeholders from the acute, primary and aged care sectors.
Forty-seven individual and group interviews were undertaken. Questions elicited views on the dimensions and utility of CE promotion by accreditation programmes.
Healthcare stakeholders' views on the dimensions and utility of CE promotion by accreditation programmes.
Four mechanisms of CE promotion were identified. Two involved requirements for health service organizations to meet CE-related standards related to consumer experience and satisfaction surveys, and consumer participation in organizational governance processes. Two mechanisms for promoting CE through accreditation processes were also identified, concerning consumer participation in the development and revision of standards, and the implementation of accreditation surveys. Accreditation programmes were viewed as important drivers of CE, yet concerns were raised regarding the organizational investments needed to meet programmes' requirements.
Accreditation programmes use diverse mechanisms as levers for change to promote CE in healthcare. These mechanisms and their inter-relationships require careful consideration by accreditation agencies and health policymakers to maximize their potential benefits, while maintaining stakeholder engagement in programmes.
探讨如何通过澳大利亚的认证计划促进消费者参与(CE)。
2012年完成的一项全国性定性研究。
澳大利亚所有八个州和领地。
来自急症、初级和老年护理部门的258名医疗保健利益相关者。
进行了47次个人和小组访谈。问题引发了对认证计划促进消费者参与的维度和效用的看法。
医疗保健利益相关者对认证计划促进消费者参与的维度和效用的看法。
确定了促进消费者参与的四种机制。两种机制涉及要求卫生服务组织达到与消费者体验和满意度调查以及消费者参与组织治理过程相关的消费者参与相关标准。还确定了通过认证过程促进消费者参与的两种机制,涉及消费者参与标准的制定和修订以及认证调查的实施。认证计划被视为促进消费者参与的重要驱动力,但对于满足计划要求所需的组织投入也存在担忧。
认证计划采用多种机制作为变革杠杆,以促进医疗保健中的消费者参与。认证机构和卫生政策制定者需要仔细考虑这些机制及其相互关系,以最大限度地发挥其潜在效益,同时保持利益相关者对计划的参与。