• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能融合与双重扫描:计算机辅助种植规划中两种数据匹配协议的比较

Smart fusion vs. double scan: a comparison between two data-matching protocols for a computer guided implant planning.

作者信息

Arcuri L, De Vico G, Ottria L, Condò R, Cerroni L, Mancini M, Barlattani A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Roma «Tor Vergata», School of Dentistry.

出版信息

Clin Ter. 2016 May-Jun;167(3):55-62. doi: 10.7417/CT.2016.1926.

DOI:10.7417/CT.2016.1926
PMID:27424503
Abstract

AIM

To make a comparison between two different approaches of data matching during the preparation of a computer guided implant planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic and manual literature searches were performed to collect information about the double-scan protocol and the smart fusion protocol. The two systems were then tested to identify or confirm their advantages and disadvantages.

RESULTS

The double scan protocol is a reliable and well-known process to obtain a fusion between the anatomical data (CBCT) and the prosthetic data (radiographic template). It is possible to use this protocol both in dentate and edentulous patients. The newly developed smart fusion technique offers the possibility to superimpose the anatomical data (CBCT) onto the prosthetic data (cast + wax-up scan) without the production of a radiographic template. This system is still being tested by the clinicians even though dental manufacturers already consider it as the best solution for the dentate patients selected for a static computer guided implant surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Smart fusion protocol offers a reasonable time and cost reduction even though its application is limited to dentate patients. A noticeable drawback of the workflow is the matching step: often a manual intervention is necessary to obtain a correct alignment of the CBCT data with the lab scan of the cast. This issue is partially due to the use of non-volume stable materials during the preparation of the cast. Future improvements could be made by combining CBCT data with direct optical scans of patient dental arches in order to create the so-called 'virtual patient'.

摘要

目的

在计算机引导种植计划制定过程中,对两种不同的数据匹配方法进行比较。

材料与方法

进行电子和手动文献检索,以收集有关双重扫描协议和智能融合协议的信息。然后对这两种系统进行测试,以确定或确认它们的优缺点。

结果

双重扫描协议是一种可靠且广为人知的方法,可用于获得解剖数据(锥形束计算机断层扫描,CBCT)和修复数据(放射影像模板)之间的融合。该协议在有牙患者和无牙患者中均可使用。新开发的智能融合技术提供了将解剖数据(CBCT)叠加到修复数据(模型+蜡型扫描)上的可能性,而无需制作放射影像模板。尽管牙科制造商已经将该系统视为选择进行静态计算机引导种植手术的有牙患者的最佳解决方案,但临床医生仍在对其进行测试。

结论

智能融合协议可合理地减少时间和成本,尽管其应用仅限于有牙患者。该工作流程的一个明显缺点是匹配步骤:通常需要人工干预才能使CBCT数据与模型的实验室扫描正确对齐。这个问题部分归因于在模型制备过程中使用了非体积稳定的材料。未来可以通过将CBCT数据与患者牙弓的直接光学扫描相结合来进行改进,以创建所谓的“虚拟患者”。

相似文献

1
Smart fusion vs. double scan: a comparison between two data-matching protocols for a computer guided implant planning.智能融合与双重扫描:计算机辅助种植规划中两种数据匹配协议的比较
Clin Ter. 2016 May-Jun;167(3):55-62. doi: 10.7417/CT.2016.1926.
2
Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report.无牙颌患者计算机引导种植手术的数字化工作流程:病例报告
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Dec;75(12):2541-2549. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
3
Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery.计算机引导种植手术的最新进展。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175.
4
Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches.无瓣计算机引导种植手术在无牙颌种植中的临床准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):1347-51. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3156.
5
Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.一种新开发的口腔种植体规划综合系统的准确性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Nov;20(11):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01764.x. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
6
A novel workflow for computer guided implant surgery matching digital dental casts and CBCT scan.一种用于计算机引导种植手术的新型工作流程,可匹配数字化牙模和CBCT扫描。
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016 Nov 13;9(1):33-48. doi: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.1.033. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
7
Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.牙列缺失上颌骨的义齿驱动计算机引导种植体植入规划:一项模型研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):238-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00110.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
8
Computer-assisted implant placement: scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and SAFE system.计算机辅助种植体植入:扫描模板、Simplant软件、手术导板和SAFE系统。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Apr;27(2):141-9.
9
Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.计算机辅助口腔种植手术的准确性:一项临床与影像学研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):234-42.
10
Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study.基于计算机断层扫描的模板(诺贝尔导板)引导种植体位置评估:一项前瞻性影像学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1157-1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02070.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Flapless Implant Placement by Means of Mucosa-Supported Templates in Complete-Arch Restorations: A Systematic Review.在全口修复中使用黏膜支持模板进行计算机辅助无瓣种植体植入的准确性:一项系统评价。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;15(4):1462. doi: 10.3390/ma15041462.
2
Comparison of Dental Surface Image Registration and Fiducial Marker Registration: An In Vivo Accuracy Study of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.牙面图像配准与基准标记配准的比较:静态计算机辅助种植手术的体内准确性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 16;10(18):4183. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184183.
3
Clinical protocol with digital cad/cam chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely worn dentition patients.
用于重度磨耗牙列患者修复的数字化CAD/CAM椅旁工作流程临床方案。
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017 Nov 30;10(3):247-261. doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.3.247. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
4
Postextraction computer-guided implant surgery in partially edentate patients with metal restorations: a case report.金属修复体部分牙列缺失患者拔牙后计算机引导种植手术:病例报告
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017 Apr 10;10(1):71-77. doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.071. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.