Hu Mu-Mei, Wang Jui, Chien Kuo-Liong, Su Chin-Ling, Lin Shin-Yi, Wu Fe-Lin Lin, Lin Zhen-Fang
Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2017 Apr;116(4):276-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In the past, warfarin was the drug of choice for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been approved as an alternative to warfarin in nonvalvular AF. However, there is a limited amount of real-world data on how NOACs are currently being used in Taiwan. This study was conducted to investigate the factors driving the initiation of anticoagulants and the selection of different anticoagulants in patients with AF.
We used National Taiwan University Hospital's electronic database to identify all nonvalvular AF patients from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the factors driving the initiation of anticoagulants and the selection of different anticoagulants.
Among AF patients, 66.4% of anticoagulants users used NOACs instead of warfarin after the era of NOACs. Patients with female sex, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, cancer, hepatic disease, renal disease, bleeding history, and aspirin use were less likely to be anticoagulant users but are more likely to be anticoagulant users with a history of stroke (odds ratio = 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-3.45). Older age, ischemic heart disease, and aspirin use were the factors associated with NOACs usage, whereas hepatic disease showed the opposite results (odds ratio = 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.42).
Stroke history was associated with anticoagulant use, whereas comorbidities associated with increased risk of bleeding showed the opposite result. Patients with hepatic disease were less likely to use NOACs.
背景/目的:过去,华法林是心房颤动(AF)患者预防中风的首选药物。最近,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs)已被批准作为非瓣膜性AF患者华法林的替代药物。然而,目前关于台湾如何使用NOACs的真实世界数据有限。本研究旨在调查AF患者启动抗凝治疗的驱动因素以及不同抗凝药物的选择。
我们使用台湾大学附属医院的电子数据库,识别2007年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间所有非瓣膜性AF患者。采用多因素逻辑回归模型来研究启动抗凝治疗的驱动因素以及不同抗凝药物的选择。
在AF患者中,66.4%的抗凝药物使用者在NOACs时代后使用了NOACs而非华法林。女性、高血压、缺血性心脏病、癌症、肝病、肾病、有出血史以及使用阿司匹林的患者使用抗凝药物的可能性较小,但有中风史的患者使用抗凝药物的可能性更大(比值比=2.64;95%置信区间,2.02-3.45)。年龄较大、缺血性心脏病和使用阿司匹林是与使用NOACs相关的因素,而肝病则显示出相反的结果(比值比=0.09;95%置信区间,0.02-0.42)。
中风史与使用抗凝药物相关,而与出血风险增加相关的合并症则显示出相反的结果。肝病患者使用NOACs的可能性较小。