• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于教师的同行评审稿件写作工作坊的实施与成果

Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop.

作者信息

Kulage Kristine M, Larson Elaine L

机构信息

Director of Research and Scholarly Development, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY..

Anna C. Maxwell Professor of Nursing Research and Associate Dean for Research, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.; Professor of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.

出版信息

J Prof Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.008
PMID:27424926
Abstract

The publication of scholarly work and research findings is an important expectation for nursing faculty; however, academic writing is often neglected, leaving dissemination through manuscript writing an area of concern for the nursing profession. Writing initiatives have been utilized to promote scholarly dissemination in schools of nursing, but those described in the literature have been primarily non-United States based and student focused. This article describes a faculty-based manuscript writing workshop, assesses participants' impressions, and describes its impact on scholarly output. The workshop is a collaborative learning process utilizing peer review to improve manuscript quality and model behaviors for improving writing and peer-reviewing skills. Seventeen workshop participants including three predoctoral students, 6 postdoctoral fellows, and 8 faculty members completed an anonymous workshop survey (81% response rate). All but 1 of 17 manuscripts reviewed in the workshop are published, accepted, or in the review process. All participants indicated that the workshop was a valuable use of time and would recommend it to colleagues. The greatest reported workshop benefit was its function as an impetus to complete and submit manuscripts. We recommend the manuscript writing workshop model for other schools of nursing seeking ways to expand their scholarly output and create accountability for dissemination through manuscript writing.

摘要

学术著作和研究成果的发表是对护理教师的一项重要期望;然而,学术写作常常被忽视,使得通过撰写手稿进行传播成为护理行业关注的一个领域。写作倡议已被用于促进护理学院的学术传播,但文献中描述的那些倡议主要是以非美国为基础且以学生为重点的。本文介绍了一个以教师为基础的手稿写作工作坊,评估了参与者的印象,并描述了其对学术产出的影响。该工作坊是一个利用同行评审来提高手稿质量并为提高写作和同行评审技能树立榜样行为的协作学习过程。17名工作坊参与者,包括3名博士生、6名博士后和8名教师,完成了一项匿名的工作坊调查(回复率为81%)。工作坊中评审的17篇手稿除1篇外均已发表、被接受或处于评审过程中。所有参与者都表示,该工作坊很有价值,会向同事推荐。报告的工作坊最大益处是它起到了促使完成并提交手稿的作用。我们建议其他护理学院采用手稿写作工作坊模式,以寻求扩大其学术产出并通过撰写手稿实现传播问责制的方法。

相似文献

1
Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop.基于教师的同行评审稿件写作工作坊的实施与成果
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
2
Promoting nursing research globally: the writing to improve nursing science (WINS) program.促进全球护理研究:提升护理科学写作(WINS)计划。
Int Nurs Rev. 2019 Dec;66(4):541-548. doi: 10.1111/inr.12552. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.撰写医学教育领域的出版文章:教师发展研讨会和同行写作小组的益处
Med Teach. 2008;30(8):e280-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590802337120.
4
Findings From the INANE Survey on Student Papers Submitted to Nursing Journals.关于提交给护理期刊的学生论文的INANE调查结果。
J Prof Nurs. 2017 May-Jun;33(3):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
Design and Evaluation of a Longitudinal Faculty Development Program to Advance Scholarly Writing Among Pharmacy Practice Faculty.设计和评估一项纵向教师发展计划,以提高药学实践教师的学术写作水平。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6556. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6556.
6
Creating a Community of Writers: Participant Perception of the Impact of a Writing Retreat on Scholarly Productivity.创建一个作家社区:参与者对写作静修对学术生产力影响的看法。
J Prof Nurs. 2019 Jan-Feb;35(1):65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
7
Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses.稿件同行评审:高级执业护士指南
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Jan;23(1):15-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00572.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
8
Peer support of a faculty "writers' circle" increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship.教师“写作圈”的同伴支持可增强开展学术研究的信心并提高其效率。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
9
The Challenge of Writing for Publication: Implications for Teaching-Learning Nursing.撰写论文以供发表的挑战:对护理教学的启示
Nurs Sci Q. 2016 Oct;29(4):277-82. doi: 10.1177/0894318416662931.
10
An Evidence-Based Approach to Increasing Nurses' Publication Rates.循证方法提高护士的发表率。
Am J Nurs. 2020 Aug;120(8):50-55. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000694584.11318.81.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.一项旨在减少随机试验中发表偏倚的活动的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;13(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5.
2
Advancing Research, Writing, and Publishing in Nursing: Addressing Challenges and Improving Standards.推进护理研究、写作和出版:应对挑战,提高标准。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Oct 7;39(38):e297. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e297.
3
Pedagogic Strategies and Contents in Medical Writing/Publishing Education: A Comprehensive Systematic Survey.
医学写作/出版教育中的教学策略与内容:一项全面的系统调查
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Sep 2;14(9):2491-2508. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14090165.
4
Impact of Performing Medical Writing/Publishing Workshops: A Systematic Survey and Meta-Analysis.开展医学写作/出版工作坊的影响:一项系统调查与荟萃分析
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Aug 10;11:23821205241269378. doi: 10.1177/23821205241269378. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
The power of peer networking for improving STEM faculty job applications: a successful pilot programme.同行网络在改善 STEM 教师工作申请方面的力量:一个成功的试点计划。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 26;290(1997):20230124. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0124.
6
"Getting Started": A Pilot Introductory Narrative Writing Session for Interprofessional Faculty in Academic Health Sciences.“入门指南”:面向学术健康科学领域跨专业教师的试点入门叙事写作课程
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Mar 15;13:265-274. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S350246. eCollection 2022.
7
Dissemination of PhD Dissertation Research by Dissertation Format: A Retrospective Cohort Study.博士论文研究成果以论文形式传播:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Sep;51(5):599-607. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12504. Epub 2019 Jul 16.