Kulage Kristine M, Larson Elaine L
Director of Research and Scholarly Development, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY..
Anna C. Maxwell Professor of Nursing Research and Associate Dean for Research, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.; Professor of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
The publication of scholarly work and research findings is an important expectation for nursing faculty; however, academic writing is often neglected, leaving dissemination through manuscript writing an area of concern for the nursing profession. Writing initiatives have been utilized to promote scholarly dissemination in schools of nursing, but those described in the literature have been primarily non-United States based and student focused. This article describes a faculty-based manuscript writing workshop, assesses participants' impressions, and describes its impact on scholarly output. The workshop is a collaborative learning process utilizing peer review to improve manuscript quality and model behaviors for improving writing and peer-reviewing skills. Seventeen workshop participants including three predoctoral students, 6 postdoctoral fellows, and 8 faculty members completed an anonymous workshop survey (81% response rate). All but 1 of 17 manuscripts reviewed in the workshop are published, accepted, or in the review process. All participants indicated that the workshop was a valuable use of time and would recommend it to colleagues. The greatest reported workshop benefit was its function as an impetus to complete and submit manuscripts. We recommend the manuscript writing workshop model for other schools of nursing seeking ways to expand their scholarly output and create accountability for dissemination through manuscript writing.
学术著作和研究成果的发表是对护理教师的一项重要期望;然而,学术写作常常被忽视,使得通过撰写手稿进行传播成为护理行业关注的一个领域。写作倡议已被用于促进护理学院的学术传播,但文献中描述的那些倡议主要是以非美国为基础且以学生为重点的。本文介绍了一个以教师为基础的手稿写作工作坊,评估了参与者的印象,并描述了其对学术产出的影响。该工作坊是一个利用同行评审来提高手稿质量并为提高写作和同行评审技能树立榜样行为的协作学习过程。17名工作坊参与者,包括3名博士生、6名博士后和8名教师,完成了一项匿名的工作坊调查(回复率为81%)。工作坊中评审的17篇手稿除1篇外均已发表、被接受或处于评审过程中。所有参与者都表示,该工作坊很有价值,会向同事推荐。报告的工作坊最大益处是它起到了促使完成并提交手稿的作用。我们建议其他护理学院采用手稿写作工作坊模式,以寻求扩大其学术产出并通过撰写手稿实现传播问责制的方法。