• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在分析宗教间关系时认真对待群体内自我评估、元偏见和偏见。

Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations.

作者信息

Putra Idhamsyah Eka

机构信息

Persada Indonesia University(Indonesia).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2016 Jul 18;19:E46. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.48.

DOI:10.1017/sjp.2016.48
PMID:27426239
Abstract

The present study aims to understand the conditions where prejudice can be predicted by ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice. The data collecting was disseminated toward Muslim and Christian participants (N = 362) living in Maumere, Flores Island, Indonesia. In Flores, Christianity is the largest religion and Islam is the second. Across two samples, the effects of ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice on prejudice were found to be moderated by ingroup self-evaluation. It shows that at high level (but not low) of positive ingroup self-evaluation, ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice were found to predict prejudice. The results suggest that it is important to consider how group members evaluate their own group and how group members think what others are thinking, in the study pertaining to intergroup relations.

摘要

本研究旨在了解内群体和外群体元偏见能够预测偏见的条件。数据收集工作面向居住在印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯岛毛梅雷的穆斯林和基督教参与者(N = 362)展开。在弗洛雷斯,基督教是最大的宗教,伊斯兰教是第二大宗教。在两个样本中,研究发现内群体和外群体元偏见对偏见的影响受到内群体自我评价的调节。结果表明,在内群体积极自我评价处于高水平(而非低水平)时,内群体和外群体元偏见能够预测偏见。研究结果表明,在涉及群体间关系的研究中,考虑群体成员如何评价自己的群体以及群体成员如何看待他人的想法非常重要。

相似文献

1
Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations.在分析宗教间关系时认真对待群体内自我评估、元偏见和偏见。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Jul 18;19:E46. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.48.
2
Identity practices, ingroup projection, and the evaluation of subgroups: a study among Turkish-Dutch Sunnis.身份认同实践、内群体投射与亚群体评价:一项在荷兰裔土耳其逊尼派中的研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;152(4):510-23. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.643325.
3
Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice.想象群体间接触可减少内隐偏见。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;49(Pt 1):129-42. doi: 10.1348/014466609X419901. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
4
The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.“我们”的另一面:当外群体成员表达共同身份时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1613-26. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323600. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Extended contact effects: is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?延伸接触效应:接触积极的外群体榜样是否足够,还是与内群体成员互动是必要的?
J Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov-Dec;151(6):737-53. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2010.522622.
6
'They will not control us': Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies.“他们无法控制我们”:内群体偏好与群体间阴谋信念
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):556-76. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12158. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
7
Blinding trust: the effect of perceived group victimhood on intergroup trust.盲目信任:感知到的群体受害感对群体间信任的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;39(1):115-27. doi: 10.1177/0146167212466114. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
8
I (dis)like the way you (dis)like them: The role of extended contact on social distance and attitudes towards the ingroup.我(不)喜欢你(不)喜欢他们的方式:扩展接触对社会距离和内群体态度的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):95-120. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12381. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
9
Intergroup Contact Effects via Ingroup Distancing among Majority and Minority Groups: Moderation by Social Dominance Orientation.多数群体和少数群体之间通过内群体疏远产生的群体间接触效应:社会支配取向的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146895. eCollection 2016.
10
A Puzzle Unsolved: Failure to Observe Different Effects of God and Religion Primes on Intergroup Attitudes.一个未解之谜:未能观察到上帝与宗教启动对群体间态度的不同影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 26;11(1):e0147178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147178. eCollection 2016.