• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大减少卫生专业人员污名化的扎根理论模型。

A grounded theory model for reducing stigma in health professionals in Canada.

机构信息

Opening Minds Anti-Stigma Initiative, Mental Health Commission of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Community Health Sciences, Department of Psychiatry & Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Aug;134 Suppl 446:53-62. doi: 10.1111/acps.12612.

DOI:10.1111/acps.12612
PMID:27426646
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Mental Health Commission of Canada was formed as a national catalyst for improving the mental health system. One of its initiatives is Opening Minds (OM), whose mandate is to reduce mental health-related stigma. This article reports findings from a qualitative study on antistigma interventions for healthcare providers, which includes a process model articulating key stages and strategies for implementing successful antistigma programmes.

METHOD

The study employed a grounded theory methodology. Data collection involved in-depth interviews with programme stakeholders, direct observation of programmes, a review of programme documents, and qualitative feedback from programme participants. Analysis proceeded via the constant comparison method. A model was generated to visually present key findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-three in-depth interviews were conducted representing 18 different programmes. Eight programmes were observed directly, 48 programme documents were reviewed, and data from 1812 programme participants were reviewed. The analysis led to a four-stage process model for implementing successful antistigma programmes targeting healthcare providers, informed by the basic social process 'targeting the roots of healthcare provider stigma'.

CONCLUSION

The process model developed through this research may function as a tool to help guide the development and implementation of antistigma programmes in healthcare contexts.

摘要

目的

加拿大精神健康委员会的成立是为了作为改善精神卫生系统的国家催化剂。其举措之一是“敞开心扉”(OM),其任务是减少与心理健康相关的污名。本文报告了一项针对医疗保健提供者抗污名干预措施的定性研究结果,其中包括一个阐明实施成功抗污名计划的关键阶段和策略的过程模型。

方法

该研究采用扎根理论方法。数据收集包括与计划利益相关者进行深入访谈、对计划进行直接观察、审查计划文件以及从计划参与者那里获得定性反馈。分析通过不断比较的方法进行。生成了一个模型来直观地呈现主要发现。

结果

共进行了 23 次深入访谈,代表了 18 个不同的计划。直接观察了 8 个计划,审查了 48 个计划文件,并审查了 1812 名计划参与者的数据。分析导致了一个针对医疗保健提供者的成功抗污名计划的四阶段过程模型,该模型受基本社会过程“针对医疗保健提供者污名的根源”的启发。

结论

通过这项研究开发的过程模型可以作为一种工具,帮助指导医疗保健环境中抗污名计划的制定和实施。

相似文献

1
A grounded theory model for reducing stigma in health professionals in Canada.加拿大减少卫生专业人员污名化的扎根理论模型。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Aug;134 Suppl 446:53-62. doi: 10.1111/acps.12612.
2
Workplace Antistigma Programs at the Mental Health Commission of Canada: Part 1. Processes and Projects.加拿大精神健康委员会的工作场所反污名化计划:第 1 部分。流程和项目。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;64(1_suppl):5S-12S. doi: 10.1177/0706743719842557.
3
What are healthcare providers' understandings and experiences of compassion? The healthcare compassion model: a grounded theory study of healthcare providers in Canada.医护人员对同情心的理解和体验是什么?加拿大医护人员的同情心模型:一项扎根理论研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019701.
4
From sin to science: fighting the stigmatization of mental illnesses.从罪恶到科学:消除精神疾病污名化。
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;57(8):457-63. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700803.
5
Workplace Antistigma Programs at the Mental Health Commission of Canada: Part 2. Lessons Learned.加拿大精神健康委员会的工作场所反污名计划:第 2 部分。经验教训。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;64(1_suppl):13S-17S. doi: 10.1177/0706743719842563. Epub 2019 May 8.
6
Key ingredients of anti-stigma programs for health care providers: a data synthesis of evaluative studies.医疗保健提供者反耻辱计划的关键要素:评估研究的数据综合分析
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;59(10 Suppl 1):S19-26. doi: 10.1177/070674371405901s06.
7
Stigma and discrimination related to mental health and substance use issues in primary health care in Toronto, Canada: a qualitative study.加拿大多伦多初级卫生保健中心与心理健康和物质使用问题相关的污名和歧视:一项定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020 Dec;15(1):1744926. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1744926.
8
Opening minds in Canada: targeting change.开启加拿大民众的思维:瞄准变革。
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;59(10 Suppl 1):S13-8. doi: 10.1177/070674371405901s05.
9
Mental illness--stigma and discrimination in Zambia.赞比亚的精神疾病——耻辱与歧视
Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2010 Jul;13(3):192-203.
10
Re-thinking HIV-Related Stigma in Health Care Settings: A Qualitative Study.重新审视医疗环境中与艾滋病相关的耻辱感:一项定性研究。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):703-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigma in Mental Health: The Status and Future Direction.心理健康中的污名化:现状与未来方向。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 5;17(6):e85398. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85398. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The exploration of attitudes and perspectives of mental health workers on peer support in Singapore.新加坡心理健康工作者对同伴支持的态度和观点探究
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00125-x.
3
Understanding stigma and attitudes towards hepatitis B among university students in Australia of Chinese and Vietnamese background.
了解在澳大利亚的中越背景的大学生中对乙型肝炎的污名化和态度。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2801. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20226-0.
4
Stigma and mental health: overcoming barriers.污名与心理健康:克服障碍
Singapore Med J. 2024 Oct 1;65(10):533-535. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-166. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
5
Prevalence of stigma towards mental illness among Portuguese healthcare professionals: a descriptive and comparative study.葡萄牙医疗保健专业人员对精神疾病的污名化患病率:一项描述性和比较性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 1;15:1425301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1425301. eCollection 2024.
6
Health equity for people living in correctional facilities: Addressing bias, stigma, and dehumanization.囚犯医疗保健公平性:消除偏见、污名化和非人性化。
Res Nurs Health. 2024 Aug;47(4):359-365. doi: 10.1002/nur.22405. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
7
Exploring the decision-making process of female genital cosmetic procedures in Iranian women and constructing and validating a results-based logic model for a healthy public policy: a study protocol.探究伊朗女性进行女性生殖器整形手术的决策过程,并构建和验证一个基于结果的公共卫生政策逻辑模型:研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 8;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01788-z.
8
Enhancing Behavioral Health Implementation in a Care Coordination Program at a Federally Qualified Health Center: A Case Study Applying Implementation Frameworks.在一家联邦合格健康中心的护理协调项目中加强行为健康实施:应用实施框架的案例研究
Health Promot Pract. 2025 May;26(3):544-556. doi: 10.1177/15248399241237958. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
9
What works for whom, how and why in mental health education for undergraduate health profession students? A realist synthesis protocol.心理健康教育对本科医学生有效吗?对谁有效?如何有效?为什么有效?一项基于实际情况的综合研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 11;14(3):e078130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078130.
10
Exploring the impact of immersive virtual reality on depression knowledge and stigma reduction: a cross-over RCT fMRI study.探索沉浸式虚拟现实对抑郁症知识及减少污名化的影响:一项交叉随机对照试验功能磁共振成像研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 2;14(1):5193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55797-w.