• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高保真模拟:评估实习护士临床判断的团队成果。

High-fidelity simulation: Assessment of student nurses' team achievements of clinical judgment.

作者信息

Hallin Karin, Bäckström Britt, Häggström Marie, Kristiansen Lisbeth

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Sweden.

Department of Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Sweden.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jul;19:12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.010
PMID:27428686
Abstract

Nursing educators have the challenge of preparing nursing students to handle complex patient care situations in real life, but much remains unknown about the ability to make clinical judgments. In this study, high-fidelity simulation (HFS) was used at a Swedish university to find answers about pre-licensure nursing students' success in clinical judgment in terms of team ability and relationships with theoretical achievements, and personal and scenario circumstances. The matrix Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was used to analyze and score the students' ability in teams to notice, interpret and respond to complex care situations. Overall, the results showed the student teams in their first meeting with HFS in a complex care situation achieved low clinical judgment points; most teams were in the stages of Beginning and Developing. For attaining high team achievements the majority of the students in the team should theoretically be "high performance". Being observers and having HFS experience before nursing education was significant too. However, age, health care experience, and assistant nurse degrees were of secondary importance. Further research at universities regionally, nationally, and internationally is needed.

摘要

护理教育工作者面临着让护理专业学生做好准备应对现实生活中复杂患者护理情况的挑战,但关于做出临床判断的能力仍有许多未知之处。在这项研究中,瑞典一所大学采用了高保真模拟(HFS),以探寻关于执照前护理专业学生在团队能力、与理论成绩的关系以及个人和场景情况方面临床判断成功与否的答案。使用矩阵式拉萨特临床判断评分量表(LCJR)来分析和评估学生团队在注意、解读和应对复杂护理情况方面的能力。总体而言,结果显示学生团队在首次面对复杂护理情况的高保真模拟时,临床判断得分较低;大多数团队处于初级和发展阶段。为了取得高团队成绩,理论上团队中的大多数学生应该是“高绩效”的。作为观察者以及在护理教育之前有高保真模拟经验也很重要。然而,年龄、医疗保健经验和助理护士学位的重要性次之。需要在地区、国家和国际层面的大学进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
High-fidelity simulation: Assessment of student nurses' team achievements of clinical judgment.高保真模拟:评估实习护士临床判断的团队成果。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jul;19:12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese.通过模拟提高临床判断能力:一项随机试验及中文版 Lasater 临床判断量表的验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9.
4
Correlations Between Clinical Judgement and Learning Style Preferences of Nursing Students in the Simulation Room.模拟病房中护生临床判断与学习风格偏好的相关性
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 28;8(6):1-13. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p1.
5
Clinical Judgment During Simulation: A Comparison of Student and Faculty Scores.模拟过程中的临床判断:学生与教师评分比较
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2017 Mar/Apr;38(2):85-86. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000109.
6
Development and validation of Dutch version of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in hospital practice: An instrument design study.《荷兰版拉萨特临床判断评分标准在医院实践中的开发与验证:一项工具设计研究》
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in nursing students in Spain.文化适应和验证 Lasater 临床判断量表在西班牙护理学生中的应用。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 May;64:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Clinical Judgment Among Nursing Students.高仿真模拟对护理学生临床判断的影响。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221081997. doi: 10.1177/00469580221081997.
9
The Korean version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: a validation study.《拉斯泰特临床判断评分量表》韩文版:一项效度研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
10
Impact of high-fidelity simulation on the development of clinical judgment and motivation among Lebanese nursing students.高保真模拟对黎巴嫩护理专业学生临床判断力和积极性发展的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov;46:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of peer learning and self-efficacy in parasympathetic activity during the simulation learning process in nursing students.同伴学习和自我效能感在护理学生模拟学习过程中副交感神经活动中的作用。
Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):552-559. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1321. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
2
Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings.病房环境中的临床推理:住院医师和主治医师的快速反应场景
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Sep 27;15:10834. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10834.
3
Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese.
通过模拟提高临床判断能力:一项随机试验及中文版 Lasater 临床判断量表的验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9.
4
Exploring nurses' experience about facilitating factors in medication administration based on clinical judgment of nurses: A content analysis.基于护士临床判断探索护士在给药过程中促进因素的经验:一项内容分析。
Electron Physician. 2017 Dec 25;9(12):6063-6071. doi: 10.19082/6063. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
Correlations Between Clinical Judgement and Learning Style Preferences of Nursing Students in the Simulation Room.模拟病房中护生临床判断与学习风格偏好的相关性
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 28;8(6):1-13. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p1.