Imber Brandon S, Kanungo Ishan, Braunstein Steve, Barani Igor J, Fogh Shannon E, Nakamura Jean L, Berger Mitchel S, Chang Edward F, Molinaro Annette M, Cabrera Juan R, McDermott Michael W, Sneed Penny K, Aghi Manish K
University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Department of Neurological Surgery and.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):129-139. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001344.
The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for recurrent glioblastoma and the radionecrosis risk in this setting remain unclear.
To perform a large retrospective study to help inform proper indications, efficacy, and anticipated complications of SRS for recurrent glioblastoma.
We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS between 1991 and 2013. We used the partitioning deletion/substitution/addition algorithm to identify potential predictor covariate cut points and Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with post-SRS and postdiagnosis survival.
One hundred seventy-four glioblastoma patients (median age, 54.1 years) underwent SRS a median of 8.7 months after initial diagnosis. Seventy-five percent had 1 treatment target (range, 1-6), and median target volume and prescriptions were 7.0 cm 3 (range, 0.3-39.0 cm 3 ) and 16.0 Gy (range, 10-22 Gy), respectively. Median overall survival was 10.6 months after SRS and 19.1 months after diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable modeling revealed that younger age at SRS, higher prescription dose, and longer interval between original surgery and SRS are significantly associated with improved post-SRS survival. Forty-six patients (26%) underwent salvage craniotomy after SRS, with 63% showing radionecrosis or mixed tumor/necrosis vs 35% showing purely recurrent tumor. The necrosis/mixed group had lower mean isodose prescription compared with the tumor group (16.2 vs 17.8 Gy; P = .003) and larger mean treatment volume (10.0 vs 5.4 cm 3 ; P = .009).
Gamma Knife may benefit a subset of focally recurrent patients, particularly those who are younger with smaller recurrences. Higher prescriptions are associated with improved post-SRS survival and do not seem to have greater risk of symptomatic treatment effect.
立体定向放射外科(SRS)在复发性胶质母细胞瘤中的作用以及在此情况下放射性坏死的风险仍不明确。
进行一项大型回顾性研究,以帮助明确SRS治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的合适适应症、疗效及预期并发症。
我们回顾性分析了1991年至2013年间接受伽玛刀SRS治疗的患者。我们使用分割删除/替换/添加算法来确定潜在预测协变量的切点,并使用Kaplan-Meier法和比例风险模型来确定与SRS后及诊断后生存相关的因素。
174例胶质母细胞瘤患者(中位年龄54.1岁)在初次诊断后中位8.7个月接受了SRS治疗。75%的患者有1个治疗靶点(范围为1 - 6个),中位靶体积和处方剂量分别为7.0 cm³(范围为0.3 - 39.0 cm³)和16.0 Gy(范围为10 - 22 Gy)。SRS后中位总生存期为10.6个月,诊断后为19.1个月。Kaplan-Meier法和多变量模型显示,SRS时年龄较小、处方剂量较高以及初次手术与SRS之间的间隔时间较长与SRS后生存改善显著相关。46例患者(26%)在SRS后接受了挽救性开颅手术,其中63%显示放射性坏死或混合性肿瘤/坏死,而35%显示为单纯复发性肿瘤。坏死/混合组与肿瘤组相比,平均等剂量处方较低(16.2 vs 17.8 Gy;P = 0.003),平均治疗体积较大(10.0 vs 5.4 cm³;P = 0.009)。
伽玛刀可能使一部分局部复发患者受益,尤其是那些年龄较小、复发灶较小的患者。较高的处方剂量与SRS后生存改善相关,且似乎不会增加有症状治疗效应的风险。