• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧输卵管切除术对卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期中窦卵泡计数及卵巢反应的影响:对侧比较

The impact of unilateral salpingectomy on antral follicle count and ovarian response in ICSI cycles: comparison of contralateral side.

作者信息

Demir Berfu, Bozdag Gurkan, Sengul Ozlem, Kahyaoglu Inci, Mumusoglu Sezcan, Zengin Dila

机构信息

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital , Ankara , Turkey.

b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hacettepe University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey , and.

出版信息

Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016 Sep;32(9):741-744. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2016.1161741. Epub 2016 Mar 26.

DOI:10.3109/09513590.2016.1161741
PMID:27430668
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of salpingectomy on the ovarian reserve. Comparisons are made with the contralateral side in patients with unilateral salpingectomy undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients under 40 with unilateral salpingectomy and without history of ovarian surgery were selected for the multicentre retrospective study. Women with bilateral salpingectomy and history of endometriosis were excluded from the study. Antral follicle count, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) parameters and number of collected oocytes were the main outcome measures of the study.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were eligible for this study. The mean age of the patients was 31.6 ± 4.7 years. The reasons for the salpingectomy were hydrosalpinx (39.3%, n = 22) and ruptured ectopic pregnancy (60.7%, n = 34). The ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 30.6%. There was no statistically significant difference between the operated and non-operated sides in antral follicle count (AFC), follicles  ≥ 17 mm and 10-17 mm on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), or number of aspirated oocytes. In the subgroup analysis, AFC, number of growing follicles on day of hCG and number of collected oocytes were comparable between the ectopic pregnancy group and hydrosalpinx group.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that salpingectomy is not associated with detrimental effects on AFC and ovarian response.

摘要

目的

确定输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响。对接受卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期治疗的单侧输卵管切除术患者的患侧与对侧进行比较。

研究设计

选择年龄小于40岁、单侧输卵管切除且无卵巢手术史的患者进行多中心回顾性研究。双侧输卵管切除及有子宫内膜异位症病史的女性被排除在研究之外。窦卵泡计数、控制性卵巢过度刺激(COH)参数及采集的卵母细胞数量是本研究的主要观察指标。

结果

共有56例患者符合本研究条件。患者的平均年龄为31.6±4.7岁。输卵管切除的原因是输卵管积水(39.3%,n = 22)和异位妊娠破裂(60.7%,n = 34)。每次胚胎移植的持续妊娠率为30.6%。在窦卵泡计数(AFC)、人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)日直径≥17mm及10 - 17mm的卵泡数量或吸出的卵母细胞数量方面,手术侧与非手术侧之间无统计学显著差异。在亚组分析中,异位妊娠组和输卵管积水组在AFC、hCG日生长卵泡数量及采集的卵母细胞数量方面具有可比性。

结论

该研究表明输卵管切除术与对AFC及卵巢反应的不良影响无关。

相似文献

1
The impact of unilateral salpingectomy on antral follicle count and ovarian response in ICSI cycles: comparison of contralateral side.单侧输卵管切除术对卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期中窦卵泡计数及卵巢反应的影响:对侧比较
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016 Sep;32(9):741-744. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2016.1161741. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
2
Ovarian Response and in Vitro Fertilization Outcomes After Salpingectomy: Does Salpingectomy Indication Matter?输卵管切除术后的卵巢反应及体外受精结局:输卵管切除指征重要吗?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):446-454.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
3
Salpingectomy may decrease antral follicle count but not live birth rate for IVF-ET patients aged 35-39 years: a retrospective study.输卵管切除术可能会降低 35-39 岁 IVF-ET 患者的窦卵泡计数,但不会降低活产率:一项回顾性研究。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Jul 20;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00678-9.
4
Prior salpingectomy impairs the retrieved oocyte number in in vitro fertilization cycles of women under 35 years old without optimal ovarian reserve.对于卵巢储备功能正常的 35 岁以下女性,既往输卵管切除术会减少其在体外受精周期中的获卵数。
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0268021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268021. eCollection 2022.
5
Assessment of ovarian reserve by antral follicle count in ovaries with endometrioma.经阴道超声窦卵泡计数评估卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者的卵巢储备功能。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):239-42. doi: 10.1002/uog.14763. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
[Prediction of ovarian reserve, poor response and pregnancy outcome based on basal antral follicle count and age in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].[基于基础窦卵泡计数和年龄对体外受精-胚胎移植患者卵巢储备、低反应及妊娠结局的预测]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011 Apr;31(4):572-7.
7
Outcomes of anti-Müllerian hormone-tailored ovarian stimulation protocols in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in women of advanced age.抗苗勒管激素定制的卵巢刺激方案在高龄女性体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中的结局
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;55(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.03.008.
8
[Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].国产高纯度尿促卵泡素对控制性卵巢刺激中体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;48(11):838-42.
9
Ovarian reserve markers and assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes in women with advanced endometriosis.晚期子宫内膜异位症女性的卵巢储备标志物与辅助生殖技术(ART)结局
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Dec 1;12:120. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-120.
10
Surgical methods for tubal pregnancy - effects on ovarian response to controlled stimulation during IVF.输卵管妊娠的手术方法——对体外受精期间卵巢对控制性刺激反应的影响
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1322-6. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12772. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Hydrosalpinx on Endometrial Implantation Failures: Evaluating Salpingectomy in Women Undergoing in vitro fertilization.积水对子宫内膜着床失败的影响:评估体外受精中接受输卵管切除术的女性。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;43(4):304-310. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722155. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Salpingectomy may decrease antral follicle count but not live birth rate for IVF-ET patients aged 35-39 years: a retrospective study.输卵管切除术可能会降低 35-39 岁 IVF-ET 患者的窦卵泡计数,但不会降低活产率:一项回顾性研究。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Jul 20;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00678-9.