Suppr超能文献

德语版本,“激越行为量表”(ABS-G)在中重度创伤性脑损伤患者中的评分者间信度、评分者内信度及内部一致性

German version, inter- and intrarater reliability and internal consistency of the "Agitated Behavior Scale" (ABS-G) in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Hellweg Stephanie, Schuster-Amft Corina

机构信息

Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Rehaklinik Bellikon, Bellikon, 5454, Switzerland.

Institute of Physiotherapy, School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, 8400, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0511-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Agitation is frequently observed during early recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Agitated behaviour often interferes with a goal-orientated rehabilitation and can be a substantial hindrance to therapy. Despite the relatively high occurance of agitation in TBI population there is no objective assessement in German (G) available. An existing scale with excellent psychometric properties is the "Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS)" developed by Corrigan in 1989. The aim of the study was to translate the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS) into German (ABS-G) and investigate the inter- and intrarater reliability and internal consistency in patients with moderate to severe TBI.

METHODS

A formal nine-step translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure (TCCA) was applied. Subsequently a prospective observational patient study was conducted. To examine the interrater reliability and internal consistency, two therapists rated 20 patients independently after a therapy session. This procedure was repeated twice on a weekly basis. The intrarater reliability was assessed through video recordings from three patients. Nine raters scored the demonstrated behaviour on the videotape with the ABS-G independently twice within one month. The inter- and intrarater reliability were evaluated with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the quadratic weighted kappa. The internal consistency was tested with Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

Behaviour of 20 patients (18 males; mean age 41 ± 20.7; mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) cognitive score on admission 7.1 ± 4.04; mean ABS-G score at first observation 17.3 ± 2.83) was assessed threefold. Interrater reliability yielded a correlation coefficient for ABS-G total score of all 60 paired observations of r s 0.845 and a weighted Kappa of 0.738. Intrarater reliability for ABS-G total score ranged between r s 0.719 and 0.953 and showed a weighted Kappa between 0.871 and 0.953. Cronbach's alpha indicated moderate internal consistency with 0.661.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the ABS-G is a reliable instrument for evaluating agitation in patients with moderate to severe TBI. Hereby it would be possible to monitor agitation objectively and optimise the management of agitated patients according to international recommendations.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的早期恢复阶段经常出现躁动。躁动行为常常干扰以目标为导向的康复治疗,并且可能成为治疗的重大障碍。尽管TBI患者中躁动的发生率相对较高,但在德国却没有可用的客观评估方法。1989年由科里根开发的“躁动行为量表(ABS)”是一种具有出色心理测量特性的现有量表。本研究的目的是将躁动行为量表(ABS)翻译成德语(ABS-G),并调查中重度TBI患者的评分者间信度、评分者内信度和内部一致性。

方法

采用正式的九步翻译和跨文化适应程序(TCCA)。随后进行了一项前瞻性观察性患者研究。为了检验评分者间信度和内部一致性,两名治疗师在一次治疗 session 后独立对20名患者进行评分。此程序每周重复两次。通过对三名患者的视频记录评估评分者内信度。九名评分者在一个月内两次独立使用ABS-G对录像带上显示的行为进行评分。评分者间信度和评分者内信度通过斯皮尔曼等级相关系数和二次加权kappa进行评估。内部一致性用克朗巴哈系数进行检验。

结果

对20名患者(18名男性;平均年龄41±20.7岁;入院时平均功能独立性测量(FIM)认知评分7.1±4.04;首次观察时平均ABS-G评分17.3±2.83)的行为进行了三次评估。评分者间信度得出,所有60对配对观察的ABS-G总分相关系数r s为0.845,加权kappa为0.738。ABS-G总分的评分者内信度在r s为0.719至0.953之间,加权kappa在0.871至0.953之间。克朗巴哈系数表明内部一致性中等,为0.661。

结论

本研究表明,ABS-G是评估中重度TBI患者躁动的可靠工具。据此,可以客观地监测躁动情况,并根据国际建议优化对躁动患者的管理。

相似文献

2
Occurrence and severity of agitated behavior after severe traumatic brain injury.
Rehabil Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):133-41. doi: 10.1002/rnj.82.
3
Factor structure of the Agitated Behavior Scale.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Jun;16(3):386-92. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402649.
4
Development of a scale for assessment of agitation following traumatic brain injury.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989 Mar;11(2):261-77. doi: 10.1080/01688638908400888.
5
The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS).
PM R. 2017 May;9(5):477-482. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Agitated behavior scale in pediatric traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2019;33(7):916-921. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1565893. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(3):289-98. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1036173. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of Agitated Behavior During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S274-81.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.04.020.
2
Agitation in cognitive disorders: International Psychogeriatric Association provisional consensus clinical and research definition.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Jan;27(1):7-17. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214001963. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
3
INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part I: posttraumatic amnesia/delirium.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):307-20. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000074.
4
Agitation after traumatic brain injury and predictors of outcome.
Brain Inj. 2014;28(3):336-40. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.873142. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
5
Occurrence and severity of agitated behavior after severe traumatic brain injury.
Rehabil Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):133-41. doi: 10.1002/rnj.82.
6
The prevalence, treatment and outcomes of agitation among patients with brain injury admitted to acute care units.
Brain Inj. 2012;26(9):1155-62. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.667587. Epub 2012 May 29.
8
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验