Shukla Bhavin, Howell Victoria, Griffiths Alicia, Thoppil Anita, Liu Monica, Carter Joseph, Young Peter
Department of Critical Care, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, Norfolk, UK.
Department of Anaesthesia, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Ultrasound. 2014 Aug;22(3):135-40. doi: 10.1177/1742271X14529761. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
Ultrasound equipment is known to act as a reservoir for potentially pathogenic organisms. The aims of these studies were to establish current cleaning practices, to review the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment in our hospital, to establish an effective cleaning regimen and to ensure that cleaning does not cause damage. A questionnaire was sent to all acute NHS hospitals in England to establish current cleaning practices. A review of our current practice was performed to establish the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment currently in use. Laboratory studies compared cleaning the probes with soap and water with decontaminating with a chlorhexidine 2% and alcohol 70% wipe, including quantifying the residual effect. Accelerated aging was performed on the probe and staff surveyed to establish potential problems with using the wipes on the probe. The survey revealed that a variety of cleaning methods were used to decontaminate ultrasound probes; 57% of our ultrasound machines were contaminated with bacteria. The laboratory studies showed superiority of the chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes over soap and water due to a residual effect, both immediately after cleaning and after 24 hours. The staff survey demonstrated no apparent change in function of the probe after cleaning with the chlorhexidine wipes. Cleaning ultrasound probes with chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes is effective and provides additional protection against bacterial contamination due to its residual effect, and appears in the short term to have no detrimental effect on the probe.
众所周知,超声设备可作为潜在致病生物的储存源。这些研究的目的是确定当前的清洁做法,评估我院超声设备的细菌污染程度,制定有效的清洁方案,并确保清洁不会造成损坏。向英格兰所有国民保健制度(NHS)急症医院发送了一份调查问卷,以确定当前的清洁做法。对我们目前的做法进行了审查,以确定目前正在使用的超声设备的细菌污染程度。实验室研究比较了用肥皂和水清洁探头与用2%氯己定和70%酒精擦拭消毒的效果,包括量化残留效果。对探头进行加速老化试验,并对工作人员进行调查,以确定在探头上使用擦拭布可能存在的问题。调查显示,使用了多种清洁方法对超声探头进行消毒;我们57%的超声机器被细菌污染。实验室研究表明,由于具有残留效果,氯己定和酒精擦拭布在清洁后立即以及24小时后均优于肥皂和水。工作人员调查表明,用氯己定擦拭布清洁后,探头功能没有明显变化。用氯己定和酒精擦拭布清洁超声探头是有效的,并且由于其残留效果可提供额外的细菌污染防护,并且短期内似乎对探头没有不利影响。