Suppr超能文献

2%氯己定/70%酒精擦拭巾在超声设备消毒中的优越性。

Superiority of chlorhexidine 2%/alcohol 70% wipes in decontaminating ultrasound equipment.

作者信息

Shukla Bhavin, Howell Victoria, Griffiths Alicia, Thoppil Anita, Liu Monica, Carter Joseph, Young Peter

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, Norfolk, UK.

Department of Anaesthesia, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound. 2014 Aug;22(3):135-40. doi: 10.1177/1742271X14529761. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

Abstract

Ultrasound equipment is known to act as a reservoir for potentially pathogenic organisms. The aims of these studies were to establish current cleaning practices, to review the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment in our hospital, to establish an effective cleaning regimen and to ensure that cleaning does not cause damage. A questionnaire was sent to all acute NHS hospitals in England to establish current cleaning practices. A review of our current practice was performed to establish the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment currently in use. Laboratory studies compared cleaning the probes with soap and water with decontaminating with a chlorhexidine 2% and alcohol 70% wipe, including quantifying the residual effect. Accelerated aging was performed on the probe and staff surveyed to establish potential problems with using the wipes on the probe. The survey revealed that a variety of cleaning methods were used to decontaminate ultrasound probes; 57% of our ultrasound machines were contaminated with bacteria. The laboratory studies showed superiority of the chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes over soap and water due to a residual effect, both immediately after cleaning and after 24 hours. The staff survey demonstrated no apparent change in function of the probe after cleaning with the chlorhexidine wipes. Cleaning ultrasound probes with chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes is effective and provides additional protection against bacterial contamination due to its residual effect, and appears in the short term to have no detrimental effect on the probe.

摘要

众所周知,超声设备可作为潜在致病生物的储存源。这些研究的目的是确定当前的清洁做法,评估我院超声设备的细菌污染程度,制定有效的清洁方案,并确保清洁不会造成损坏。向英格兰所有国民保健制度(NHS)急症医院发送了一份调查问卷,以确定当前的清洁做法。对我们目前的做法进行了审查,以确定目前正在使用的超声设备的细菌污染程度。实验室研究比较了用肥皂和水清洁探头与用2%氯己定和70%酒精擦拭消毒的效果,包括量化残留效果。对探头进行加速老化试验,并对工作人员进行调查,以确定在探头上使用擦拭布可能存在的问题。调查显示,使用了多种清洁方法对超声探头进行消毒;我们57%的超声机器被细菌污染。实验室研究表明,由于具有残留效果,氯己定和酒精擦拭布在清洁后立即以及24小时后均优于肥皂和水。工作人员调查表明,用氯己定擦拭布清洁后,探头功能没有明显变化。用氯己定和酒精擦拭布清洁超声探头是有效的,并且由于其残留效果可提供额外的细菌污染防护,并且短期内似乎对探头没有不利影响。

相似文献

2
Chlorhexidine cleaning of re-usable bougies.重复使用的探条的氯己定清洁。
Anaesthesia. 2013 Aug;68(8):830-4. doi: 10.1111/anae.12269. Epub 2013 May 15.
5
Cleaning methods for ultrasound probes.超声探头的清洁方法。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 May;18(5):286-9.
8
Disinfecting the iPad: evaluating effective methods.对iPad进行消毒:评估有效方法。
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Jun;87(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Incidence of residual bacterial contamination of transvaginal ultrasound probes.经阴道超声探头残留细菌污染的发生率。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2019 Oct;46(4):475-479. doi: 10.1007/s10396-019-00941-7. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Degradation of ultrasound probes caused by disinfection with alcohol.酒精消毒导致超声探头降解。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2011 Apr;38(2):97-100. doi: 10.1007/s10396-010-0296-1. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
2
Chlorhexidine cleaning of re-usable bougies.重复使用的探条的氯己定清洁。
Anaesthesia. 2013 Aug;68(8):830-4. doi: 10.1111/anae.12269. Epub 2013 May 15.
5
Ultrasound and the risk of nosocomial cross infection.超声与医院内交叉感染风险
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;36(2):131-3. doi: 10.1002/uog.7729.
8
Infection control in anaesthesia.麻醉中的感染控制。
Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):1027-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05657.x.
9
Cleaning methods for ultrasound probes.超声探头的清洁方法。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 May;18(5):286-9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验