Groeber F, Schober L, Schmid F F, Traube A, Kolbus-Hernandez S, Daton K, Hoffmann S, Petersohn D, Schäfer-Korting M, Walles H, Mewes K R
Fraunhofer Institute of Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, Stuttgart, Germany.
Toxicol In Vitro. 2016 Oct;36:254-261. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
To replace the Draize skin irritation assay (OECD guideline 404) several test methods based on reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) have been developed and were adopted in the OECD test guideline 439. However, all validated test methods in the guideline are linked to RHE provided by only three companies. Thus, the availability of these test models is dependent on the commercial interest of the producer. To overcome this limitation and thus to increase the accessibility of in vitro skin irritation testing, an open source reconstructed epidermis (OS-REp) was introduced. To demonstrate the capacity of the OS-REp in regulatory risk assessment, a catch-up validation study was performed. The participating laboratories used in-house generated OS-REp to assess the set of 20 reference substances according to the performance standards amending the OECD test guideline 439. Testing was performed under blinded conditions. The within-laboratory reproducibility of 87% and the inter-laboratory reproducibility of 85% prove a high reliability of irritancy testing using the OS-REp protocol. In addition, the prediction capacity was with an accuracy of 80% comparable to previous published RHE based test protocols. Taken together the results indicate that the OS-REp test method can be used as a standalone alternative skin irritation test replacing the OECD test guideline 404.
为取代德莱兹皮肤刺激试验(经合组织准则404),已开发出几种基于重建人表皮(RHE)的测试方法,并被纳入经合组织测试准则439。然而,该准则中所有经过验证的测试方法都仅与三家公司提供的RHE相关。因此,这些测试模型的可用性取决于生产商的商业利益。为克服这一限制,从而提高体外皮肤刺激测试的可及性,引入了一种开源重建表皮(OS-REp)。为证明OS-REp在监管风险评估中的能力,开展了一项追赶式验证研究。参与研究的实验室使用内部生成的OS-REp,根据修订经合组织测试准则439的性能标准,对20种参考物质进行评估。测试在盲态条件下进行。87%的实验室内再现性和85%的实验室间再现性证明,使用OS-REp方案进行刺激测试具有很高的可靠性。此外,预测能力的准确率为80%,与之前发表的基于RHE的测试方案相当。综合来看,结果表明OS-REp测试方法可作为一种独立的替代皮肤刺激测试方法,取代经合组织测试准则404。