Shantakumar Sumitra, Nordstrom Beth L, Djousse Luc, Hall Susan A, Gagnon David R, Fraeman Kathy H, van Herk-Sukel Myrthe, Chagin Karen, Nelson Jeanenne
Worldwide Epidemiology, R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, 150 Beach Road, #26-00 Gateway West, Singapore, 189720, Singapore.
Center of Excellence in Epidemiology, Evidera, Lexington, MA, USA.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;78(3):559-66. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3112-9. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
To quantify the hepatic safety of pazopanib and comparator anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies in clinical practice among renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients.
A population-based cohort study of new anti-VEGF users was conducted in two US healthcare databases, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and an oncology practice network (Altos), and the PHARMO Database Network in The Netherlands. A common protocol was used to collect liver chemistry (LC) data from anti-VEGF initiation through 4 years of follow-up. In the VA population, suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) outcomes were investigated via chart review, with adjudication by hepatologists.
In Altos and VA, respectively, the total RCC patients were: pazopanib (156, 243), bevacizumab (122, 99), sorafenib (82, 249) and sunitinib (285, 751). PHARMO contained too few patients to be included. Few cases of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥8× the upper limit of normal were seen across the anti-VEGF cohorts; incidence rates (per 100 person-years) ranged from 0 (sunitinib) to 8.2 (pazopanib) in Altos and from 0 (bevacizumab and sorafenib) to 2.1 (pazopanib) among VA patients. No cases of Hy's law identified by combination LC elevations were seen in patients treated with pazopanib or bevacizumab; one case was observed in those treated with sorafenib, and two cases were found among sunitinib users. One case of adjudicated DILI was observed in a sunitinib-treated patient; none were found among patients treated with pazopanib, bevacizumab or sorafenib.
Severe liver injury occurred infrequently during exposure to pazopanib and other anti-VEGF therapies in a population-based setting.
在临床实践中,对肾细胞癌(RCC)患者使用帕唑帕尼及对照抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)疗法的肝脏安全性进行量化评估。
在美国两个医疗保健数据库(退伍军人事务部(VA)和一个肿瘤学实践网络(阿尔托斯))以及荷兰的PHARMO数据库网络中,对新使用抗VEGF药物的患者进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。采用通用方案收集从开始使用抗VEGF药物至随访4年期间的肝化学(LC)数据。在VA人群中,通过病历审查调查疑似药物性肝损伤(DILI)结局,并由肝病专家进行判定。
在阿尔托斯和VA中,RCC患者总数分别为:帕唑帕尼(156例、243例)、贝伐单抗(122例、99例)、索拉非尼(82例、249例)和舒尼替尼(285例、751例)。PHARMO纳入的患者过少,未纳入分析。在所有抗VEGF队列中,很少见到丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)≥8倍正常上限的情况;发病率(每100人年)在阿尔托斯队列中,从舒尼替尼的0至帕唑帕尼的8.2不等,在VA患者中,从贝伐单抗和索拉非尼的0至帕唑帕尼的2.1不等。在接受帕唑帕尼或贝伐单抗治疗的患者中,未发现因LC联合升高而符合Hy法则的病例;在接受索拉非尼治疗的患者中观察到1例,在舒尼替尼使用者中发现2例。在1例接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者中观察到1例经判定的DILI;在接受帕唑帕尼、贝伐单抗或索拉非尼治疗的患者中未发现。
在基于人群的研究中,接受帕唑帕尼和其他抗VEGF疗法期间,严重肝损伤很少发生。