Jujo Kentaro, Saito Katsumi, Ishida Issei, Furuki Yuho, Ouchi Taisuke, Kim Ahsung, Suzuki Yuki, Sekiguchi Haruki, Yamaguchi Junichi, Ogawa Hiroshi, Hagiwara Nobuhisa
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University.
Circ J. 2016 Aug 25;80(9):1922-30. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0347. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) improves patency in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), but improvement in clinic blood pressure (BP) is seen in only 20-40% of patients who undergo PTRA. This study investigated the effects of PTRA on BP lowering, assessed on 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and identified preoperative features predictive of satisfactory BP improvement after PTRA.
Of 1,753 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography, 31 patients with angiographically significant ARAS and translesional pressure gradient (TLPG) >20 mmHg underwent PTRA. ABPM was performed before, at 1 month and at 1 year after PTRA; patients with average systolic ABPM-BP decrease >10 mmHg at 1 month from baseline were categorized as responders. There was no obvious relationship between clinic BP and ABPM-BP at baseline. ABPM-BP was significantly higher in responders at baseline (SBP: 148 vs. 126 mmHg, P<0.01) and was improved 1 month after PTRA. This difference persisted until 1 year after PTRA. Night-time BP improved more than daytime BP in responders. Patients with higher baseline ABPM-BP achieved a larger decrease in ABPM-BP, but the severity of stenosis reflected by TLPG; renal duplex findings; and neurohumoral parameters other than baseline renal function, did not differ between the groups.
Clinic BP does not represent daily hemodynamic status, whereas high ABPM-BP is a potent predictor of satisfactory BP response to PTRA. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1922-1930).
经皮腔内肾血管成形术(PTRA)可改善动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄(ARAS)的通畅率,但接受PTRA治疗的患者中只有20% - 40%的患者临床血压(BP)得到改善。本研究调查了PTRA对血压降低的影响(通过24小时动态血压监测[ABPM]评估),并确定了PTRA术后血压改善满意的术前预测特征。
在1753例连续接受冠状动脉造影的患者中,31例血管造影显示有显著ARAS且跨病变压力梯度(TLPG)>20 mmHg的患者接受了PTRA。在PTRA术前、术后1个月和1年进行ABPM;术后1个月平均收缩期ABPM - BP较基线下降>10 mmHg的患者被归类为反应者。基线时临床血压与ABPM - BP之间无明显关系。反应者基线时的ABPM - BP显著更高(收缩压:148 vs. 126 mmHg,P<0.01),且PTRA术后1个月有所改善。这种差异持续到PTRA术后1年。反应者夜间血压比白天血压改善更明显。基线ABPM - BP较高的患者ABPM - BP下降幅度更大,但TLPG反映的狭窄严重程度、肾脏双功超声检查结果以及除基线肾功能外的神经体液参数在两组之间无差异。
临床血压不能代表日常血流动力学状态,而高ABPM - BP是PTRA术后血压反应满意的有力预测指标。(《循环杂志》2016年;80:1922 - 1930)