Avet-Loiseau Hervé, Fonseca Rafael, Siegel David, Dimopoulos Meletios A, Špička Ivan, Masszi Tamás, Hájek Roman, Rosiñol Laura, Goranova-Marinova Vesselina, Mihaylov Georgi, Maisnar Vladimír, Mateos Maria-Victoria, Wang Michael, Niesvizky Ruben, Oriol Albert, Jakubowiak Andrzej, Minarik Jiri, Palumbo Antonio, Bensinger William, Kukreti Vishal, Ben-Yehuda Dina, Stewart A Keith, Obreja Mihaela, Moreau Philippe
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse INSERM U1037, Toulouse, France; L'Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Toulouse, France;
Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ;
Blood. 2016 Sep 1;128(9):1174-80. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-707596. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
The presence of certain high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, such as translocations (4;14) and (14;16) and deletion (17p), are known to have a negative impact on survival in multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 3 study ASPIRE (N = 792) demonstrated that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed MM. This preplanned subgroup analysis of ASPIRE was conducted to evaluate KRd vs Rd by baseline cytogenetics according to fluorescence in situ hybridization. Of 417 patients with known cytogenetic risk status, 100 patients (24%) were categorized with high-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 48; Rd, n = 52) and 317 (76%) were categorized with standard-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 147; Rd, n = 170). For patients with high-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd resulted in a median PFS of 23.1 months, a 9-month improvement relative to treatment with Rd. For patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd led to a 10-month improvement in median PFS vs Rd. The overall response rates for KRd vs Rd were 79.2% vs 59.6% (high-risk cytogenetics) and 91.2% vs 73.5% (standard-risk cytogenetics); approximately fivefold as many patients with high- or standard-risk cytogenetics achieved a complete response or better with KRd vs Rd (29.2% vs 5.8% and 38.1% vs 6.5%, respectively). KRd improved but did not abrogate the poor prognosis associated with high-risk cytogenetics. This regimen had a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsed MM, irrespective of cytogenetic risk status, and should be considered a standard of care in these patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01080391.
某些高危细胞遗传学异常的存在,如易位(4;14)和(14;16)以及缺失(17p),已知会对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的生存产生负面影响。3期研究ASPIRE(N = 792)表明,与来那度胺和地塞米松(Rd)相比,卡非佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松(KRd)可显著改善复发MM患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。本项ASPIRE预先计划的亚组分析旨在根据荧光原位杂交,通过基线细胞遗传学评估KRd与Rd的疗效。在417例已知细胞遗传学风险状态的患者中,100例(24%)被归类为高危细胞遗传学(KRd组48例;Rd组52例),317例(76%)被归类为标准风险细胞遗传学(KRd组147例;Rd组170例)。对于高危细胞遗传学患者,KRd治疗的中位PFS为23.1个月,相对于Rd治疗有9个月的改善。对于标准风险细胞遗传学患者,KRd治疗的中位PFS比Rd延长了10个月。KRd与Rd的总体缓解率分别为79.2%和59.6%(高危细胞遗传学)以及91.2%和73.5%(标准风险细胞遗传学);高危或标准风险细胞遗传学患者中,达到完全缓解或更好缓解的患者数量,KRd组约为Rd组的五倍(分别为29.2%对5.8%和38.1%对6.5%)。KRd改善了但并未消除与高危细胞遗传学相关的不良预后。该方案在复发MM患者中具有良好的效益风险比,无论细胞遗传学风险状态如何,都应被视为这些患者的标准治疗方案。本试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为#NCT01080391。