Sonneveld Pieter, Avet-Loiseau Hervé, Lonial Sagar, Usmani Saad, Siegel David, Anderson Kenneth C, Chng Wee-Joo, Moreau Philippe, Attal Michel, Kyle Robert A, Caers Jo, Hillengass Jens, San Miguel Jesús, van de Donk Niels W C J, Einsele Hermann, Bladé Joan, Durie Brian G M, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Mateos María-Victoria, Palumbo Antonio, Orlowski Robert
Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
Laboratory for Genomics in Myeloma, University Cancer Center of Toulouse, Toulouse, France;
Blood. 2016 Jun 16;127(24):2955-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
The International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the definition for high-risk (HR) multiple myeloma based on cytogenetics Several cytogenetic abnormalities such as t(4;14), del(17/17p), t(14;16), t(14;20), nonhyperdiploidy, and gain(1q) were identified that confer poor prognosis. The prognosis of patients showing these abnormalities may vary with the choice of therapy. Treatment strategies have shown promise for HR cytogenetic diseases, such as proteasome inhibition in combination with lenalidomide/pomalidomide, double autologous stem cell transplant plus bortezomib, or combination of immunotherapy with lenalidomide or pomalidomide. Careful analysis of cytogenetic subgroups in trials comparing different treatments remains an important goal. Cross-trial comparisons may provide insight into the effect of new drugs in patients with cytogenetic abnormalities. However, to achieve this, consensus on definitions of analytical techniques, proportion of abnormal cells, and treatment regimens is needed. Based on data available today, bortezomib and carfilzomib treatment appear to improve complete response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in t(4;14) and del(17/17p), whereas lenalidomide may be associated with improved progression-free survival in t(4;14) and del(17/17p). Patients with multiple adverse cytogenetic abnormalities do not benefit from these agents. FISH data are implemented in the revised International Staging System for risk stratification.
国际骨髓瘤工作组基于细胞遗传学对高危多发性骨髓瘤的定义进行了更新。已确定几种细胞遗传学异常,如t(4;14)、del(17/17p)、t(14;16)、t(14;20)、非超二倍体和1q增益,这些异常提示预后不良。出现这些异常的患者的预后可能因治疗选择而异。治疗策略已显示出对高危细胞遗传学疾病的前景,如蛋白酶体抑制联合来那度胺/泊马度胺、双次自体干细胞移植加硼替佐米,或免疫疗法与来那度胺或泊马度胺联合使用。在比较不同治疗方法的试验中仔细分析细胞遗传学亚组仍然是一个重要目标。跨试验比较可能有助于深入了解新药对细胞遗传学异常患者的疗效。然而,要实现这一点,需要在分析技术的定义、异常细胞比例和治疗方案方面达成共识。根据目前可得的数据,硼替佐米和卡非佐米治疗似乎可改善t(4;14)和del(17/17p)患者的完全缓解、无进展生存期和总生存期,而来那度胺可能与t(4;14)和del(17/17p)患者的无进展生存期改善相关。具有多种不良细胞遗传学异常的患者无法从这些药物中获益。荧光原位杂交(FISH)数据已应用于修订后的国际分期系统进行风险分层。