Reim Daniel, Strobl Andreas N, Buchner Christian, Schirren Rebekka, Mueller Werner, Luppa Peter, Ankerst Donna Pauler, Friess Helmut, Novotny Alexander
Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar Zentrum Mathematik Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4322. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004322.
The influence of perioperative transfusion (PT) on outcome following surgery for gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial, with randomized trials lacking and observational series confounded by patient risk factors. This analysis determines the association between reception of leukocyte-depleted blood products and post-operative survival for GC.Data from 610 patients who underwent curative surgery for GC in a German tertiary care clinic from 2001 to 2013 were included. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied to determine the association of PT and clinical and patient risk factors for overall and relapse-free survival. Propensity score analysis was performed to adjust for observational biases in reception of PT.Higher Union International Contre le Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC)-stages (P <0.001), postoperative complications and severity according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification (P <0.001), PT (P = 0.02), higher age (P <0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P <0.001) were related to increased mortality rates. Higher UICC-stages (P <0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P <0.001), and type of surgery (P = 0.02) were independently associated with increased relapse rates. Patients were more likely to receive PT with higher age (P = 0.05), surgical extension to adjacent organs/structures (P = 0.002), tumor location (P = 0.003), and female gender (P = 0.03). In the adjusted propensity score weighted analysis, PT remained associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio (HR): 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.69, P = 0.04).Because of the association of PT with negative influence on patient survival following resection for GC, risks from application of blood products should be weighed against the potential benefits.
围手术期输血(PT)对胃癌(GC)手术后结局的影响仍存在争议,由于缺乏随机试验,且观察性系列研究受到患者风险因素的干扰。本分析确定了接受去白细胞血液制品与GC患者术后生存率之间的关联。纳入了2001年至2013年在德国一家三级护理诊所接受GC根治性手术的610例患者的数据。应用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox比例风险回归分析来确定PT与总体生存和无复发生存的临床及患者风险因素之间的关联。进行倾向评分分析以校正PT接受情况中的观察性偏倚。国际抗癌联盟/美国癌症联合委员会(UICC/AJCC)分期较高(P<0.001)、根据Clavien-Dindo(CD)分类的术后并发症及严重程度(P<0.001)、PT(P=0.02)、年龄较大(P<0.001)和新辅助化疗(P<0.001)与死亡率增加相关。UICC分期较高(P<0.001)、新辅助化疗(P<0.001)和手术类型(P=0.02)与复发率增加独立相关。患者年龄较大(P=0.05)、手术范围累及相邻器官/结构(P=0.002)、肿瘤位置(P=0.003)和女性(P=0.03)时更有可能接受PT。在调整后的倾向评分加权分析中,PT仍与死亡风险增加相关(风险比(HR):1.31,95%置信区间:1.01-1.69,P=0.04)。由于PT与GC切除术后对患者生存的负面影响相关,应权衡应用血液制品的风险与潜在益处。