Suppr超能文献

侵袭性胎盘植入患者剖宫产的麻醉方式及临床结局:50例连续病例的回顾性队列研究

Mode of anesthesia and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Cesarean delivery for invasive placentation: a retrospective cohort study of 50 consecutive cases.

作者信息

Nguyen-Lu Nhathien, Carvalho Jose Carlos Almeida, Kingdom John, Windrim Rory, Allen Lisa, Balki Mrinalini

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Room 19-104, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;63(11):1233-44. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0695-x. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Invasive placentation is one of the most important causes of postpartum hemorrhage and Cesarean hysterectomies (CHyst). The optimal mode of anesthesia in the management of these patients remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to review the impact of mode of anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with invasive placentation undergoing Cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in women with invasive placentation who delivered at our hospital during 2000-2012. Patients' charts and electronic health records were searched for relevant data, including obstetric and anesthetic procedures, blood loss, use of resuscitation fluids, and neonatal and maternal complications. Based on the initial planned mode of anesthesia (i.e., general or regional) for CD, comparisons were made between groups for maternal blood loss and transfusion, respiratory complications, and neonatal Apgar scores.

RESULTS

Of the 50 women with confirmed invasive placentation, 25 (50%) underwent elective CD, while the remaining 25 (50%) had unplanned CD; 36 (72%) required CHyst. Surgery for 34 (68%) patients commenced under regional anesthesia (RA), and surgery for 16 (32%) patients commenced under general anesthesia (GA). In women who received GA vs RA, there was no difference in mean (SD) blood loss [3,206 (3,777) mL vs 1,906 (1096) mL, respectively; mean difference, 1,300 mL; 95% confidence interval (CI), -739 to 3,339 mL; P = 0.20] or median [IQR] blood transfusion (4 [0-6] units vs 2 [0-4] units, respectively; median difference, 2 units; 95% CI, 0 to 4 units; P = 0.16). In neonates of women who received only RA before delivery vs those who received GA prior to delivery, significantly higher median [IQR] Apgar scores were observed at both one minute (8 [8-9] vs 3 [0-5], respectively; median difference, 5; 95% CI, 3 to 8; P < 0.001) and five minutes (9 [9-9] vs 7 [0-9], respectively; median difference, 2; 95% CI, 1 to 9; P < 0.001). Postoperative respiratory complications were more common with GA (6%) than with RA (0%) (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Having safely performed two-thirds of our cases of CHyst under RA, our study suggests that RA, when compared with GA, is associated with no differences in blood loss or blood transfusion, superior neonatal outcome, and fewer respiratory complications. This suggests that RA can be considered a primary mode of anesthesia for such cases.

摘要

目的

侵袭性胎盘植入是产后出血和剖宫产子宫切除术(CHyst)的最重要原因之一。这些患者管理中的最佳麻醉方式仍不确定。本研究的目的是回顾麻醉方式对接受剖宫产(CD)的侵袭性胎盘植入女性的母婴结局的影响。

方法

对2000 - 2012年在我院分娩的侵袭性胎盘植入女性进行回顾性队列研究。检索患者病历和电子健康记录以获取相关数据,包括产科和麻醉程序、失血量、复苏液的使用以及新生儿和母亲并发症。根据CD最初计划的麻醉方式(即全身或区域),比较两组之间的母亲失血量和输血情况、呼吸系统并发症以及新生儿阿氏评分。

结果

在50例确诊为侵袭性胎盘植入的女性中,25例(50%)接受了择期CD,其余25例(50%)为非计划CD;36例(72%)需要CHyst。34例(68%)患者的手术在区域麻醉(RA)下开始,16例(32%)患者的手术在全身麻醉(GA)下开始。接受GA与RA的女性相比,平均(标准差)失血量无差异[分别为3206(3777)mL和1906(1096)mL;平均差异为1300 mL;95%置信区间(CI)为 - 739至3339 mL;P = 0.20]或中位数[四分位间距]输血情况无差异[分别为4(0 - 6)单位和2(0 - 4)单位;中位数差异为2单位;95% CI为0至4单位;P = 0.16]。在分娩前仅接受RA的女性的新生儿与接受GA的女性的新生儿相比,在1分钟时(分别为8 [8 - 9]和3 [0 - 5];中位数差异为5;95% CI为3至8;P < 0.001)和5分钟时(分别为9 [9 - 9]和7 [0 - 9];中位数差异为2;95% CI为1至9;P < 0.001),观察到显著更高的中位数[四分位间距]阿氏评分。GA术后呼吸系统并发症(6%)比RA(0%)更常见(P = 0.03)。

结论

我们三分之二的CHyst病例在RA下安全完成,我们的研究表明,与GA相比,RA在失血量或输血方面无差异,新生儿结局更好,呼吸系统并发症更少。这表明RA可被视为此类病例的主要麻醉方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验