Warsinske Hayley C, Wheaton Amanda K, Kim Kevin K, Linderman Jennifer J, Moore Bethany B, Kirschner Denise E
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Jun 23;7:183. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00183. eCollection 2016.
Pulmonary fibrosis is pathologic remodeling of lung tissue that can result in difficulty breathing, reduced quality of life, and a poor prognosis for patients. Fibrosis occurs as a result of insult to lung tissue, though mechanisms of this response are not well-characterized. The disease is driven in part by dysregulation of fibroblast proliferation and differentiation into myofibroblast cells, as well as pro-fibrotic mediator-driven epithelial cell apoptosis. The most well-characterized pro-fibrotic mediator associated with pulmonary fibrosis is TGF-β1. Excessive synthesis of, and sensitivity to, pro-fibrotic mediators as well as insufficient production of and sensitivity to anti-fibrotic mediators has been credited with enabling fibroblast accumulation. Available treatments neither halt nor reverse lung damage. In this study we have two aims: to identify molecular and cellular scale mechanisms driving fibroblast proliferation and differentiation as well as epithelial cell survival in the context of fibrosis, and to predict therapeutic targets and strategies. We combine in vitro studies with a multi-scale hybrid agent-based computational model that describes fibroblasts and epithelial cells in co-culture. Within this model TGF-β1 represents a pro-fibrotic mediator and we include detailed dynamics of TGF-β1 receptor ligand signaling in fibroblasts. PGE2 represents an anti-fibrotic mediator. Using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis we identify TGF-β1 synthesis, TGF-β1 activation, and PGE2 synthesis among the key mechanisms contributing to fibrotic outcomes. We further demonstrate that intervention strategies combining potential therapeutics targeting both fibroblast regulation and epithelial cell survival can promote healthy tissue repair better than individual strategies. Combinations of existing drugs and compounds may provide significant improvements to the current standard of care for pulmonary fibrosis. Thus, a two-hit therapeutic intervention strategy may prove necessary to halt and reverse disease dynamics.
肺纤维化是肺组织的病理性重塑,可导致患者呼吸困难、生活质量下降和预后不良。纤维化是肺组织受损伤的结果,但其反应机制尚未完全明确。该疾病部分由成纤维细胞增殖失调和分化为肌成纤维细胞,以及促纤维化介质驱动的上皮细胞凋亡所驱动。与肺纤维化相关的最明确的促纤维化介质是转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1)。促纤维化介质的过度合成和敏感性增加,以及抗纤维化介质的产生和敏感性不足,被认为导致了成纤维细胞的积累。现有的治疗方法既不能阻止也不能逆转肺损伤。在本研究中,我们有两个目标:确定在纤维化背景下驱动成纤维细胞增殖和分化以及上皮细胞存活的分子和细胞尺度机制,并预测治疗靶点和策略。我们将体外研究与一个多尺度混合基于代理的计算模型相结合,该模型描述了共培养中的成纤维细胞和上皮细胞。在这个模型中,TGF-β1代表促纤维化介质,我们纳入了成纤维细胞中TGF-β1受体配体信号传导的详细动力学。前列腺素E2(PGE2)代表抗纤维化介质。通过不确定性和敏感性分析,我们确定TGF-β1合成、TGF-β1激活和PGE2合成是导致纤维化结果的关键机制。我们进一步证明,结合针对成纤维细胞调节和上皮细胞存活的潜在治疗方法的干预策略,比单独的策略能更好地促进健康组织修复。现有药物和化合物的组合可能会显著改善目前肺纤维化的治疗标准。因此,可能需要一种双重打击的治疗干预策略来阻止和逆转疾病动态。