Suppr超能文献

腰椎椎间融合术中羟基磷灰石脱矿骨基质与自体骨融合率的匹配比较

Matched Comparison of Fusion Rates between Hydroxyapatite Demineralized Bone Matrix and Autograft in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Kim Dae Hwan, Lee Nam, Shin Dong Ah, Yi Seong, Kim Keung Nyun, Ha Yoon

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Jul;59(4):363-7. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.4.363. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the fusion rate of a hydroxyapatite demineralized bone matrix (DBM) with post-laminectomy acquired autograft in lumbar interbody fusion surgery and to evaluate the correlation between fusion rate and clinical outcome.

METHODS

From January 2013 to April 2014, 98 patients underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery with hydroxyapatite DBM (HA-DBM group) in our institute. Of those patients, 65 received complete CT scans for 12 months postoperatively in order to evaluate fusion status. For comparison with autograft, we selected another 65 patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery with post-laminectomy acquired autograft (Autograft group) during the same period. Both fusion material groups were matched in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and bone mineral density (BMD). To evaluate the clinical outcomes, we analyzed the results of visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

We reviewed the CT scans of 149 fusion levels in 130 patients (HA-DBM group, 75 levels/65 patients; Autograft group, 74 levels/65 patients). Age, sex, BMI, and BMD were not significantly different between the groups (p=0.528, p=0.848, p=0.527, and p=0.610, respectively). The HA-DBM group showed 39 of 75 fused levels (52%), and the Autograft group showed 46 of 74 fused levels (62.2%). This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.21). In the HA-DBM group, older age and low BMD were significantly associated with non-fusion (61.24 vs. 66.68, p=0.027; -1.63 vs. -2.29, p=0.015, respectively). VAS and ODI showed significant improvement after surgery when fusion was successfully achieved in both groups (p=0.004, p=0.002, HA-DBM group; p=0.012, p=0.03, Autograft group).

CONCLUSION

The fusion rates of the hydroxyapatite DBM and Autograft groups were not significantly different. In addition, clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. However, older age and low BMD are risk factors that might induce non-union after surgery with hydroxyapatite DBM.

摘要

目的

比较腰椎椎间融合手术中羟基磷灰石脱矿骨基质(DBM)与椎板切除术后自体骨移植的融合率,并评估融合率与临床疗效之间的相关性。

方法

2013年1月至2014年4月,我院98例患者接受了使用羟基磷灰石DBM的腰椎椎间融合手术(HA-DBM组)。其中65例患者术后12个月接受了完整的CT扫描以评估融合状态。为了与自体骨移植进行比较,我们选择了同期另外65例接受椎板切除术后自体骨移植的腰椎椎间融合手术患者(自体骨移植组)。两个融合材料组在年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和骨密度(BMD)方面进行了匹配。为了评估临床疗效,我们分析了视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)的结果。

结果

我们回顾了130例患者(HA-DBM组,75个节段/65例患者;自体骨移植组,74个节段/65例患者)149个融合节段的CT扫描。两组患者的年龄、性别、BMI和BMD无显著差异(分别为p = 0.528、p = 0.848、p = 0.527和p = 0.610)。HA-DBM组75个融合节段中有39个(52%)融合,自体骨移植组74个融合节段中有46个(62.2%)融合。这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.21)。在HA-DBM组中,年龄较大和BMD较低与未融合显著相关(分别为61.24对66.68,p = 0.027;-1.63对-2.29,p = 0.015)。两组成功实现融合后,VAS和ODI术后均有显著改善(HA-DBM组,p = 0.004,p = 0.002;自体骨移植组,p = 0.012,p = 0.03)。

结论

羟基磷灰石DBM组和自体骨移植组的融合率无显著差异。此外,两组的临床疗效相似。然而,年龄较大和BMD较低是羟基磷灰石DBM手术后可能导致不愈合的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3af9/4954884/597f30cafa8a/jkns-59-363-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验