• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同脱矿骨基质在后路腰椎体间融合中的融合率比较。

Comparison of Fusion Rates among Various Demineralized Bone Matrices in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si 13620, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 2;60(2):265. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020265.

DOI:10.3390/medicina60020265
PMID:38399552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10890174/
Abstract

: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) plays a crucial role in addressing various spinal disorders. The success of PLIF is contingent upon achieving bone fusion, as failure can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has emerged as a promising solution for promoting fusion due to its unique combination of osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three distinct DBMs (Exfuse, Bongener, and Bonfuse) in achieving fusion rates in PLIF surgery. : A retrospective review was conducted on 236 consecutive patients undergoing PLIF between September 2016 and February 2019. Patients over 50 years old with degenerative lumbar disease, receiving DBM, and following up for more than 12 months after surgery were included. Fusion was evaluated using the Bridwell grading system. Bridwell grades 1 and 2 were defined as 'fusion', while grades 3 and 4 were considered 'non-fusion.' Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the European quality of life-5 (EQ-5D). : Fusion rates were 88.3% for Exfuse, 94.3% for Bongener, and 87.7% for Bonfuse, with no significant differences. All groups exhibited significant improvement in clinical outcomes at 12 months after surgery, but no significant differences were observed among the three groups. : There were no significant differences in fusion rates and clinical outcomes among Exfuse, Bongener, and Bonfuse in PLIF surgery.

摘要

后路腰椎体间融合术(PLIF)在治疗各种脊柱疾病中起着至关重要的作用。PLIF 的成功取决于是否能实现骨融合,因为失败可能会导致不良的临床结果。脱钙骨基质(DBM)具有成骨诱导和骨传导特性,是一种很有前途的促进融合的解决方案。本研究旨在比较三种不同的 DBM(Exfuse、Bongener 和 Bonfuse)在 PLIF 手术中实现融合率的效果。

对 2016 年 9 月至 2019 年 2 月期间接受 PLIF 的 236 例连续患者进行了回顾性研究。纳入标准为年龄大于 50 岁、患有退行性腰椎疾病、接受 DBM 治疗且术后随访 12 个月以上的患者。融合评估采用 Bridwell 分级系统。Bridwell 分级 1 和 2 定义为“融合”,分级 3 和 4 为“未融合”。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和欧洲生活质量 5 维度(EQ-5D)评估临床结果。

Exfuse 组的融合率为 88.3%,Bongener 组为 94.3%,Bonfuse 组为 87.7%,差异无统计学意义。三组患者术后 12 个月临床结果均显著改善,但三组间无显著差异。

在 PLIF 手术中,Exfuse、Bongener 和 Bonfuse 之间的融合率和临床结果无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617f/10890174/ee8fb62be621/medicina-60-00265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617f/10890174/1bde816c1cad/medicina-60-00265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617f/10890174/ee8fb62be621/medicina-60-00265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617f/10890174/1bde816c1cad/medicina-60-00265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617f/10890174/ee8fb62be621/medicina-60-00265-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Fusion Rates among Various Demineralized Bone Matrices in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.不同脱矿骨基质在后路腰椎体间融合中的融合率比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 2;60(2):265. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020265.
2
Comparative Study of Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix Alone or with Low-Dose Escherichia coli-Derived rhBMP-2.单纯使用脱钙骨基质或低浓度大肠杆菌来源 rhBMP-2 行微创侧方腰椎间融合术患者的影像学和临床结局的对比研究
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e557-e565. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.028. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.腰椎管狭窄症伴退变性不稳定性患者后路横突间融合与后路腰椎间融合的临床疗效比较。
Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):383-406.
4
[Application of ultrasonic osteotome in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery by unilateral fenestration and bilateral decompression in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].超声骨刀在单侧开窗双侧减压后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 15;33(4):416-422. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201808037.
5
Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases.后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)与改良经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(M-TLIF)治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的安全性和疗效比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 30;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04531-3.
6
Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.经皮内镜下腰椎间融合术与改良后路腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 16;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04544-y.
7
Reduction in adjacent-segment degeneration after multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion with proximal DIAM implantation.后路多节段腰椎间融合联合近端 DIAM 植入物后邻近节段退变的减少。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):190-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14666. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].腰椎滑脱症腰骶融合术后相邻节段退变:一项回顾性影像学及临床分析
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30.
9
Anterolateral versus posterior minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up.后路与前路微创腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症:12 个月随访的全球多中心研究结果比较。
Spine J. 2023 Oct;23(10):1494-1505. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: A STROBE-compliant study.比较单纯斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗头侧相邻节段疾病翻修:一项遵循STROBE规范的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(40):e12680. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012680.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Fusion Rate and Functional Outcome Between Local Cancellous Bone Plus Demineralized Bone Matrix and Local Bone in 1-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.后路单节段腰椎间融合术中局部松质骨加脱钙骨基质与局部骨融合率和功能结局的比较
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Aug 1;35(7):E621-E626. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001330. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Comparative Study of Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix Alone or with Low-Dose Escherichia coli-Derived rhBMP-2.单纯使用脱钙骨基质或低浓度大肠杆菌来源 rhBMP-2 行微创侧方腰椎间融合术患者的影像学和临床结局的对比研究
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e557-e565. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.028. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Applications and Future Trends.脊柱手术中的脱矿骨基质:当前应用及未来趋势综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Apr;15(s1):113-119. doi: 10.14444/8059. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls.腰椎椎间融合术:技术、要点与陷阱
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):730-741. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0485. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors.成人及儿童脊柱畸形手术中的假关节形成:文献系统综述及发病率、特征和危险因素的荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Jun;42(2):319-336. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0951-3. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
Bone Union Rate Following Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion: Comparison between Demineralized Bone Matrix versus Hydroxyapatite.后路腰椎融合内固定术后的骨融合率:脱矿骨基质与羟基磷灰石的比较
Asian Spine J. 2016 Dec;10(6):1149-1156. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1149. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Matched Comparison of Fusion Rates between Hydroxyapatite Demineralized Bone Matrix and Autograft in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.腰椎椎间融合术中羟基磷灰石脱矿骨基质与自体骨融合率的匹配比较
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Jul;59(4):363-7. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.4.363. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
8
The fusion rate of demineralized bone matrix compared with autogenous iliac bone graft for long multi-segment posterolateral spinal fusion.脱矿骨基质与自体髂骨移植用于长节段多节段后外侧脊柱融合的融合率比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 5;17:3. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0861-2.
9
Demineralized bone matrix, as a graft enhancer of auto-local bone in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.脱矿骨基质作为腰椎后路椎间融合术中自体局部骨的移植增强剂。
Asian Spine J. 2014 Apr;8(2):129-37. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.2.129. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
10
Minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.微创与开放后路腰椎体间融合术的比较:系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1792-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3619-5.