• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本科牙科诊所种植牙修复的成功率和存留率:一项为期13年的回顾性研究,平均随访5.8年。

Success and Survival Rates of Dental Implants Restored at an Undergraduate Dental Clinic: A 13-Year Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 5.8 Years.

作者信息

Daneshvar Shahrzad S, Matthews Debora C, Michuad Pierre-Luc, Ghiabi Edmond

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):870-5. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4507.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.4507
PMID:27447155
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and patient-based outcomes of dental implants placed at an undergraduate student dental clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to determine the success and survival rates of dental implants placed at the undergraduate dental clinic at Dalhousie University between January 1999 and January 2012. Only patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Clinical and radiographic assessments determined implant success and survival rates. Questionnaires recorded patients' satisfaction with esthetics, comfort, and ease of hygiene.

RESULTS

Of the 352 patients (n = 591 implants) who received implants over 13 years, 165 patients completed the clinical and radiographic examinations. By the end of the study period, demographic information and implant characteristics were collected for 111 (n = 217 implants; 47.5% in the maxilla, 52.6% in the mandible) of these patients. Of those assessed clinically, 36.4% were males and 63.6% females, with a mean age of 56.1 ± 14.15 years (range, 17 to 86 years) at the time of implant placement. The mean follow-up period was 5.8 years (range, 1 to 13 years). The overall implant success and survival rates were 88.0% and 97.2%, respectively. No observable bone loss was evident in 88.0% of the surviving implants. There were no implant fractures. Most patients (91.2%) were very satisfied with the implant restoration appearance, 88.0% were very comfortable with the implant, 92.6% were very satisfied with their ability to chew, and 84.8% reported easy hygiene maintenance at the implant sites.

CONCLUSION

Implant success and survival in an undergraduate student clinic were comparable to those reported in the literature. It seems that inexperienced students were able to provide restorations that were very satisfying to the patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在本科学生牙科诊所植入牙种植体的临床、影像学及基于患者的治疗效果。

材料与方法

进行一项回顾性研究,以确定1999年1月至2012年1月间在达尔豪斯大学本科牙科诊所植入牙种植体的成功率和存留率。仅纳入随访至少1年的患者。通过临床和影像学评估确定种植体的成功率和存留率。问卷调查记录患者对美观、舒适度及口腔卫生便捷性的满意度。

结果

在13年间接受种植体植入的352例患者(共591枚种植体)中,165例患者完成了临床和影像学检查。到研究期结束时,收集了其中111例患者(共217枚种植体;上颌47.5%,下颌52.6%)的人口统计学信息和种植体特征。在接受临床评估的患者中,男性占36.4%,女性占63.6%,种植体植入时的平均年龄为56.1±14.15岁(范围为17至86岁)。平均随访期为5.8年(范围为1至13年)。种植体的总体成功率和存留率分别为88.0%和97.2%。在88.0%的存留种植体中未观察到明显的骨吸收。没有种植体折断情况。大多数患者(91.2%)对种植修复体外观非常满意,88.0%对种植体感觉非常舒适,92.6%对咀嚼能力非常满意,84.8%报告种植部位的口腔卫生维护容易。

结论

本科学生诊所的种植体成功率和存留率与文献报道相当。似乎经验不足的学生能够提供令患者非常满意的修复体。

相似文献

1
Success and Survival Rates of Dental Implants Restored at an Undergraduate Dental Clinic: A 13-Year Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 5.8 Years.本科牙科诊所种植牙修复的成功率和存留率:一项为期13年的回顾性研究,平均随访5.8年。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):870-5. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4507.
2
Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.即刻加载种植体在拔牙窝中的应用:5 年临床结果的回顾性分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00297.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
3
Surgical experience influences 2-stage implant osseointegration.手术经验会影响二期种植体骨结合。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):2771-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.031. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
4
Survival of Dental Implants Placed in Grafted and Nongrafted Bone: A Retrospective Study in a University Setting.种植于移植骨和非移植骨中的牙种植体的存留率:一项大学环境下的回顾性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):310-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4681.
5
The effect of smoking on survival and bone loss of implants with a fluoride-modified surface: a 2-year retrospective analysis of 1106 implants placed in daily practice.吸烟对氟改性表面种植体存活率和骨质流失的影响:一项 1106 例种植体在日常实践中 2 年回顾性分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jun;23(6):758-766. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02201.x. Epub 2011 May 5.
6
Clinical and Retrospective Evaluation of 4.1- or 4.3-mm-Diameter Implants Placed Immediately in the Molar Region: A Preliminary Study.4.1毫米或4.3毫米直径种植体即刻植入磨牙区的临床及回顾性评估:一项初步研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;74(3):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
7
Retrospective study of 68 implants placed in the pterygomaxillary region using drills and osteotomes.对使用钻头和骨凿植入翼上颌区域的68颗种植体进行回顾性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):720-6.
8
A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible.下颌骨种植体存活率的长期回顾性分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1348-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3910.
9
A 5-year prospective multicenter clinical trial of non-submerged dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface in 200 patients.5 年前瞻性多中心临床试验,200 例患者使用钛等离子喷涂表面非埋入式牙种植体。
J Periodontol. 2011 Jul;82(7):990-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.100464. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
10
Peri-implant Tissues and Patient Satisfaction After Treatment of Vertically Augmented Atrophic Posterior Mandibles with Intraoral Onlay Block Bone Grafts: A Retrospective 3-Year Case Series Follow-up Study.采用口内嵌体块状骨移植治疗垂直性骨增量萎缩后下颌骨后的种植体周围组织及患者满意度:一项为期3年的回顾性病例系列随访研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):137-144. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4490.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.钛和氧化锆种植体基台临床结果的比较:系统评价的系统综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 28;11(17):5052. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175052.