• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植支持式义齿修复无牙颌患者满意度的评估

Assessment of Satisfaction Level of Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated with Implant-Supported Prostheses.

作者信息

de Souza Fernando Isquierdo, de Souza Costa Alessandro, Dos Santos Pereira Rodrigo, Dos Santos Paulo Henrique, de Brito Rui Barbosa, Rocha Eduardo Passos

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):884-90. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4267.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.4267
PMID:27447157
Abstract

PURPOSE

Edentulism usually leads to esthetic, functional, and emotional discomfort resulting in a loss of self-esteem and a decrease of the patient's quality of life. Dental implants provide new possibilities to ensure the comfort and efficacy of prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction level of patients rehabilitated using the Brånemark protocol or overdenture implant-supported prostheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients were rehabilitated using the Brånemark protocol and 23 using overdenture prostheses. Then, an adapted oral health-related quality of life questionnaire was administered in addition to a clinical exam to determine the condition of the dental implants and prostheses. The results for treatment expectation, understanding of the type of treatment, phonetic function, chewing comfort, pain, and self-esteem improvement were analyzed with Fisher exact test (P ≤ .05).

RESULTS

Both treatments presented satisfaction of above 87%, with no statistical difference between them. Eighty-two percent of patients treated with overdenture prostheses and 80.8% of those treated with the Brånemark protocol had no complaint of pain (P = .087).

CONCLUSION

The treatments analyzed in this study were highly satisfactory with regard to functional and esthetic factors, resulting in an increase in self-esteem and quality of life. The psychological factor is a complex variable in patient satisfaction that directly influences quality of life. Considering the desires of patients in choosing the type of prosthesis is critical to treatment success.

摘要

目的

无牙颌通常会导致美观、功能和情感上的不适,从而导致自尊丧失和患者生活质量下降。牙种植体为确保修复康复的舒适度和有效性提供了新的可能性。本研究的目的是评估使用布兰emark方案或覆盖义齿种植体支持修复体进行修复的患者的满意度水平。

材料与方法

52例患者采用布兰emark方案进行修复,23例采用覆盖义齿修复。然后,除了进行临床检查以确定牙种植体和修复体的状况外,还发放了一份与口腔健康相关的生活质量问卷。使用Fisher精确检验分析治疗期望、对治疗类型的理解、语音功能、咀嚼舒适度、疼痛和自尊改善方面的结果(P≤0.05)。

结果

两种治疗的满意度均高于87%,两者之间无统计学差异。82%接受覆盖义齿修复的患者和80.8%接受布兰emark方案治疗的患者没有疼痛主诉(P=0.087)。

结论

本研究分析的治疗在功能和美学因素方面非常令人满意,从而提高了自尊和生活质量。心理因素是患者满意度中的一个复杂变量,直接影响生活质量。考虑患者在选择修复体类型方面的愿望对治疗成功至关重要。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Satisfaction Level of Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated with Implant-Supported Prostheses.种植支持式义齿修复无牙颌患者满意度的评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):884-90. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4267.
2
Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.种植覆盖义齿和固定全口义齿的患者满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量结局。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):791-800.
3
Analysis of Satisfaction Levels in Completely Edentulous Patients Treated with Different Configurations of Implant- Supported Prostheses.不同种植体支持式修复体配置治疗无牙颌患者的满意度分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Oct 16;39(5):776-782. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10734.
4
Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.比较中年无牙患者下颌种植体支持覆盖义齿与传统义齿的疗效:满意度和功能评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):117-22.
5
A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers.一种用于评估种植体支持覆盖义齿和混合义齿佩戴者口腔健康相关生活质量的全新、简短、特定的问卷(QoLIP-10)。
J Dent. 2013 Sep;41(9):753-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
6
Prosthetic hygiene and functional efficacy in completely edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life during a 5-year follow-up.全口无牙患者的义齿卫生与功能疗效:5年随访期间的满意度和生活质量
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Dec;27(12):1500-1505. doi: 10.1111/clr.12604. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
7
Measuring patient-based outcomes: is treatment satisfaction associated with oral health-related quality of life?测量患者为基础的结果:治疗满意度与口腔健康相关的生活质量有关吗?
J Dent. 2012 Aug;40(8):624-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses.采用种植体支持覆盖义齿和固定义齿修复的无牙颌患者的口腔健康影响概况及修复状况
J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;51(4):535-43. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.535.
9
Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.隐性营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症患者的种植体修复及患者对种植体支持的上部结构的满意度
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):651-5.
10
Outcome of treatment with implant-retained dental prostheses in patients with Sjögren syndrome.干燥综合征患者使用种植体支持式假牙修复的治疗效果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Sep-Oct;14(5):736-43.

引用本文的文献

1
Regeneration of Buccal Wall Defects after Tooth Extraction with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in Injectable Form vs. Bovine Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.注射型双相磷酸钙与牛异种移植物用于拔牙后颊壁缺损再生的随机对照临床试验
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 19;11(9):223. doi: 10.3390/dj11090223.
2
Challenges faced by edentulous patients (EDPs) during complete denture prostheses (CDP) service delivery in Fiji - a qualitative study.斐济全口义齿修复服务中无牙颌患者(EDP)面临的挑战——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):742. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08136-6.
3
The Thermal Influence of Oral Rehabilitation on the Cranio-Cervico-Mandibular Complex: A Thermographic Analysis.
口腔修复对颅颌颈复合体的热影响:一种热成像分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 4;18(19):10441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910441.