Presentations and Publications: Timing and Transparency.
作者信息
Berquist Thomas H
机构信息
1 Editor in Chief
出版信息
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):227-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16833.
PMID:27447340
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Presentations and Publications: Timing and Transparency.报告与发表：时间安排与透明度。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):227-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16833.
2
In reference to "The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings".关于“住院医师在科学会议上发言的价值”。
J Voice. 2015 Mar;29(2):261.e29-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.07.007.
3
Letter to the Editor regarding "The Value of Resident Presentations at Scientific Meetings".致编辑的信：关于“住院医师在科学会议上发言的价值”
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):891-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.017. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
4
The new reviewer assistance program: a multipronged approach!新的审稿人协助计划：一种多管齐下的方法！
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):1. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10940.
5
Pneumologia's workshops: how to write a scientific article.《肺炎学》研讨会：如何撰写科学论文。
Pneumologia. 2015 Oct-Dec;64(4):47.
6
[To improve transparency of biomedical publications].
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2004 Jan-Feb;62(1):5-6.
7
Journals should set a new standard in transparency.期刊应在透明度方面树立新的标准。
Nature. 2007 Jan 25;445(7126):364. doi: 10.1038/445364a.
8
A bit confused.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1509; author reply 1509-10. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821d121c.
9
To peer review or not to peer review: that seems to be the question.同行评审与否：这似乎是个问题。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Nov;185(5):1101. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.5.1101.
10
Bad science, sloppy reporting, and retracted publications: should peer review be the scapegoat?糟糕的科学、草率的报道和撤稿的出版物：同行评议应该成为替罪羊吗？
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Jun;35(6):411-2. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.907685.
Zotero 插件