Dönmez Esra, Koç Mevlüt, Şeker Taner, İçen Yahya Kemal, Çayli Murat
Adana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Serinevler Mah., Ege Bağatur Bulvarı Üzeri, Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;32(10):1471-6. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0943-8. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
Conflicting data is present in the literature about patients who are treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to the exaggeration of the non culprit artery. The precise understanding of the non culprit artery in the setting of ST segment elevated myocardial infarct (STEMI) is important since the time and modality of the treatment is planned accordingly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the lesions in the non culprit coronary artery during primary PCI and control coronary angiography (CAG) using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in multivessel STEMI patients. In this study, multivessel disease STEMI patients whom underwent primary PCI between January 2010 and March 2011 were included. Critical stenosis degree was accepted as ≥70 % in the non culprit artery. All patients were evaluated with control CAG 1 month after primary PCI. Assessment with CAG was performed by two blinded cardiologists. QCA program was used to evaluate reference artery diameter (RAD), minimum luminal diameter (MLD) and degree of stenosis. With regard to the degree of stenosis, significant reduction was accepted as ≥15 % while % 5-15 decrease was accepted as moderate. Of the 81 patients, 61 were males and 20 were females (mean age 58.1 ± 10). In the control CAG, the degree of non culprit artery stenosis was found to be decreased (p < 0.001) while RAD and MLD were increased (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Significant decrease in critical non culprit artery lesions was detected in 22 patients (20.9 %) meanwhile moderate reduction was observed in 26 patients (24.7 %). In 14 patients (13.3 %), non culprit artery lesions accepted as critical during primary PCI were found to be non critical during the control CAG. Planned intervention was cancelled and medical treatment was initiated in those 14 patients. Our data indicated using QCA, approximately the half of non culprit lesions were found less critical during control CAG when compared to primary PCI. Therefore, it is concluded that complete revascularization during primary PCI should be avoided in multivessel STEMI patients and critical non culprit artery lesions should be re-evaluated with later control CAG.
关于因非罪犯血管扩张而接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者,文献中存在相互矛盾的数据。在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)情况下,准确了解非罪犯血管很重要,因为治疗的时间和方式是据此规划的。本研究的目的是使用定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)评估多支血管STEMI患者在直接PCI和对照冠状动脉造影(CAG)期间非罪犯冠状动脉的病变情况。在本研究中,纳入了2010年1月至2011年3月期间接受直接PCI的多支血管病变STEMI患者。非罪犯血管的临界狭窄程度被定义为≥70%。所有患者在直接PCI后1个月接受对照CAG评估。CAG评估由两名不知情的心脏病专家进行。使用QCA程序评估参考动脉直径(RAD)、最小管腔直径(MLD)和狭窄程度。关于狭窄程度,显著降低被定义为≥15%,而5%-15%的降低被定义为中度。81例患者中,61例为男性,20例为女性(平均年龄58.1±10岁)。在对照CAG中,发现非罪犯血管狭窄程度降低(p<0.001),而RAD和MLD增加(分别为p<0.001和p<0.001)。22例患者(20.9%)检测到临界非罪犯血管病变显著减少,同时26例患者(24.7%)观察到中度减少。14例患者(13.3%)在直接PCI期间被视为临界的非罪犯血管病变在对照CAG期间被发现为非临界病变。在这14例患者中取消了计划的干预并开始药物治疗。我们的数据表明,使用QCA时,与直接PCI相比,约一半的非罪犯病变在对照CAG期间被发现不那么严重。因此,得出结论,多支血管STEMI患者应避免在直接PCI期间进行完全血运重建,临界非罪犯血管病变应在后期对照CAG时重新评估。