• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间罪犯血管单独处理与完全冠状动脉血运重建的比较

Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI.

作者信息

Qarawani Dahud, Nahir Menachem, Abboud Mouin, Hazanov Yevgeny, Hasin Yonathan

机构信息

Cardiovascular Department, Poria Medical Center, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 24;123(3):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.013
PMID:17428557
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Currently it is recommended to treat only the culprit artery during the acute procedure. Only few reports describe the results of simultaneous non-culprit vessel PCI. The study hypothesizes that complete revascularization during primary PCI can be achieved safely with an improved clinical outcome during the indexed hospitalization.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty consecutive patients presented with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary stenosis. Ninety five underwent complete revascularization (CR): the culprit artery was opened first followed by dilatation of the other significantly narrowed arteries. Twenty five had culprit only revascularization (COR): the culprit artery only was dilated and the other arteries were left untreated during the primary PCI.

RESULTS

Complete revascularization (CR) was associated with reduced incidence of major cardiac events (recurrent ischemia, reinfarction, acute heart failure and in-hospital mortality 16.7 versus 52%, P=0.0001). There was a significant lower rate of recurrent ischemic episodes (4.2% versus 32%, P=0.002), myocardial reinfarction (3.1% versus 16%, P=0.01), reintervention (7.3% versus 32%, P=0.001), acute heart failure (9.4% versus 32%, P=0.01) during the indexed hospitalization and shorter hospitalization (4.4+/-1.27 versus 9.6+/-2.3, P=0.001) in the CR group. Transient renal dysfunction was more common in CR patients (8.4% versus 4% P=0.01). In-hospital and one year mortality were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Multivessel PCI during acute myocardial infarction is feasible and safe. Complete revascularization resulted in an improved acute clinical course. These data support a policy of complete revascularization during primary PCI for STEMI.

摘要

背景

直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的首选治疗方法。目前建议在急性期手术中仅治疗罪犯血管。仅有少数报告描述了同期非罪犯血管PCI的结果。该研究假设在直接PCI期间实现完全血运重建可安全进行,并能改善本次住院期间的临床结局。

方法

连续纳入120例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)合并多支冠状动脉狭窄的患者。95例行完全血运重建(CR):先开通罪犯血管,随后对其他明显狭窄的血管进行扩张。25例行仅罪犯血管血运重建(COR):在直接PCI期间仅扩张罪犯血管,其他血管不予处理。

结果

完全血运重建(CR)与主要心脏事件发生率降低相关(复发缺血、再梗死、急性心力衰竭和住院死亡率分别为16.7%和52%,P = 0.0001)。在本次住院期间,CR组复发缺血事件发生率显著较低(4.2%对32%,P = 0.002)、心肌再梗死发生率较低(3.1%对16%,P = 0.01)、再次干预率较低(7.3%对32%,P = 0.001)、急性心力衰竭发生率较低(9.4%对32%,P = 0.01),且住院时间较短(4.4±1.27天对9.6±2.3天,P = 0.001)。CR患者中短暂性肾功能不全更为常见(8.4%对4%,P = 0.01)。两组的住院死亡率和1年死亡率相似。

结论

急性心肌梗死期间多支血管PCI是可行且安全的。完全血运重建可改善急性临床病程。这些数据支持对STEMI患者在直接PCI期间进行完全血运重建的策略。

相似文献

1
Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间罪犯血管单独处理与完全冠状动脉血运重建的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 24;123(3):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
2
Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report.急性冠状动脉综合征患者单纯罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管血运重建:美国心脏病学会国家心血管数据库注册研究报告
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.09.007.
3
Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction.多支血管病变和急性心肌梗死患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Am Heart J. 2004 Sep;148(3):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.051.
4
Complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease: a randomized comparison.多支血管病变中完全血运重建与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的随机对照研究
Am Heart J. 2004 Sep;148(3):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.026.
5
[Does percutaneous coronary intervention in non-culprit vessels improve the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction complicated by pump failure?].[非罪犯血管的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能否改善并发泵衰竭的急性心肌梗死的预后?]
J Cardiol. 2005 Jul;46(1):1-8.
6
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.分期与“一次性”多血管经皮介入治疗急性心肌梗死的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与结局的协调)试验的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071.
7
Management of multivessel coronary disease after ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后经直接血管成形术治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病的管理
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Feb;21(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00317.x. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
8
Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients aged over 75 years.75岁以上急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Jul 20;119(14):1151-6.
9
Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,比较急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时由医生转运与由患者转运的情况。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Mar 20;121(6):485-91.
10
Primary PCI in STEMI--dilemmas and controversies: multivessel disease in STEMI patients. Complete versus Culprit Vessel revascularization in acute ST--elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——困境与争议:ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的多支血管病变。急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死完全血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2011 Jun;59(3):225-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of residual myocardial ischemia on recovery of left ventricular function after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余心肌缺血对左心室功能恢复的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03777-3.
2
What Promotes Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease-Contrast Media, Hydration Status or Something Else?是什么导致心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病患者发生急性肾损伤——造影剂、水化状态还是其他原因?
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 21;15(1):21. doi: 10.3390/nu15010021.
3
Revascularization strategies for patients with myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease: A critical appraisal of the current evidence.
心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的血运重建策略:对当前证据的批判性评估
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Sep;16(9):717-723. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.001.
4
Metaanalysis of Multivessel vs Culprit Artery Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中多支血管与仅罪犯血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的Meta分析
Ochsner J. 2019 Summer;19(2):107-115. doi: 10.31486/toj.18.0033.
5
Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction - The Primacy of Randomised Trials.ST段抬高型心肌梗死的预防性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——随机试验的首要地位
Interv Cardiol. 2015 Mar;10(1):32-34. doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.32.
6
Complete versus culprit only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a perspective on recent trials and recommendations.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中完全血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行血运重建——关于近期试验和建议的观点
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):2159-2167. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.95.
7
Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.急性心肌梗死和多血管病变的再灌注策略。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):665-678. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.88. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 3;5(5):CD011986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011986.pub2.
9
Conservative pharmacotherapy vs. staged percutaneous coronary intervention for non-culprit vessels in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者非罪犯血管的保守药物治疗与分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对比
Exp Ther Med. 2016 Dec;12(6):4147-4153. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3895. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Total revascularization for an epsilon right coronary artery and severe left main disease combined with profound cardiogenic shock: A case report.一例右冠状动脉ε支及严重左主干病变合并严重心源性休克患者的完全血运重建:病例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5667. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005667.