Vartanian Lenny R, Herman C Peter, Polivy Janet
School of Psychology, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada.
Eat Behav. 2016 Dec;23:24-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Norms of appropriateness have been used to account for the influence of a variety of external eating cues (e.g., social factors, portion size) on people's food intake. What is less clear is what, exactly, "appropriate" means. This study explored participants' conceptions of appropriate food intake. Two separate samples were included in this study: 121 university students (73% women) and 107 community members (100% women). Participants were asked to rate the extent to which several statements reflected the concept of "appropriate food intake" or "normal food intake" (1=Does not capture the definition at all; 7=Captures the definition perfectly). These statements included items referring to external eating cues (e.g., "Eating as much as other people", "Eating the entire portion of what you are served") and items referring to internal eating cues (e.g., "Eating an amount that will make you feel satisfied") or nutritional needs (e.g., "Eating a healthy amount"). Repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that participants consistently defined appropriate/normal intake in terms of internal eating cues and nutritional needs. In contrast, despite evidence indicating that perceptions of how much is an appropriate amount to eat are affected by external eating cues, external eating cues were ignored in participants' definition of appropriate/normal intake. The disconnect between how people define appropriate intake (i.e., in terms of internal cues) and what research shows affects norms of appropriateness (i.e., external cues) may reflect people's general unwillingness to acknowledge the influence of external eating cues on their food intake.
适宜性规范已被用于解释各种外部饮食线索(如社会因素、食物分量)对人们食物摄入量的影响。但尚不清楚的是,“适宜”究竟意味着什么。本研究探讨了参与者对适宜食物摄入量的概念。本研究纳入了两个独立样本:121名大学生(73%为女性)和107名社区成员(100%为女性)。参与者被要求对若干陈述在多大程度上反映“适宜食物摄入量”或“正常食物摄入量”的概念进行评分(1=完全未体现该定义;7=完美体现该定义)。这些陈述包括涉及外部饮食线索的项目(如“和其他人吃一样多”、“把端给你的食物全部吃完”)以及涉及内部饮食线索的项目(如“吃到感觉满足的量”)或营养需求的项目(如“吃健康的量”)。重复测量方差分析表明,参与者始终根据内部饮食线索和营养需求来定义适宜/正常摄入量。相比之下,尽管有证据表明对适量饮食的认知会受到外部饮食线索的影响,但参与者在定义适宜/正常摄入量时忽略了外部饮食线索。人们定义适宜摄入量的方式(即根据内部线索)与研究表明影响适宜性规范的因素(即外部线索)之间的脱节,可能反映出人们普遍不愿意承认外部饮食线索对其食物摄入量的影响。