Elsey Helen, Khanal Sudeepa, Manandhar Shraddha, Sah Dilip, Baral Sushil Chandra, Siddiqi Kamran, Newell James Nicholas
Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development (NCIHD), University of Leeds, Room G.22, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
Health Research and Social Development Forum (HERD) Nepal, Thapathali, POBox: 24133, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 22;11:104. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0466-7.
By 2030, 80 % of the annual 8.3 million deaths attributable to tobacco will be in low-income countries (LICs). Yet, services to support people to quit tobacco are not part of routine primary care in LICs. This study explored the challenges to implementing a behavioural support (BS) intervention to promote tobacco cessation within primary care in Nepal.
The study used qualitative and quantitative methods within an action research approach in three primary health care centres (PHCCs) in two districts of Nepal. Before implementation, 21 patient interviews and two focus groups with health workers informed intervention design. Over a 6-month period, two researchers facilitated action research meetings with staff and observed implementation, recording the process and their reflections in diaries. Patients were followed up 3 months after BS to determine tobacco use (verified biochemically) and gain feedback on the intervention. A further five interviews with managers provided reflections on the process. The qualitative analysis used Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to understand implementation.
Only 2 % of out-patient appointments identified the patient as a smoker. Qualitative findings highlight patients' unwillingness to admit their smoking status and limited motivation among health workers to offer the intervention. Patient-centred skills needed for BS were new to staff, who found them challenging particularly with low-literacy patients (skill set workability). Heath workers saw cessation advice and BS as an addition to their existing workload (relational integration). While there was strong policy buy-in, operationalising this through reporting and supervision was limited (contextual integration). Of the 44 patients receiving the intervention, 27 were successfully followed up after 3 months; 37 % of these had quit (verified biochemically).
Traditionally, primary health care in LICs has focused on acute care; with increasing recognition of the need for lifestyle change, health workers must develop new skills and relationships with patients. Appropriate and regular recording, reporting, supervision and clear leadership are needed if health workers are to take responsibility for smoking cessation. The consistent implementation of these health system activities is a requirement if cessation services are to be normalised within routine primary care.
到2030年,每年因烟草导致的830万例死亡中,80%将发生在低收入国家。然而,在低收入国家,支持人们戒烟的服务并非常规初级保健的一部分。本研究探讨了在尼泊尔初级保健中实施行为支持干预以促进戒烟所面临的挑战。
本研究在尼泊尔两个地区的三个初级卫生保健中心采用行动研究方法,运用了定性和定量方法。在实施干预前,对21名患者进行访谈,并与卫生工作者开展了两个焦点小组讨论,为干预设计提供依据。在6个月的时间里,两名研究人员协助工作人员召开行动研究会议并观察干预实施情况,将过程及他们的思考记录在日记中。在行为支持干预3个月后对患者进行随访,以确定其烟草使用情况(通过生化检验核实)并收集对干预措施的反馈。另外对管理人员进行了五次访谈,以了解他们对该过程的看法。定性分析运用了规范化过程理论来理解干预措施的实施情况。
在门诊预约中,只有2%的患者被确定为吸烟者。定性研究结果表明,患者不愿承认自己的吸烟状况,且卫生工作者提供干预措施的积极性有限。行为支持所需的以患者为中心的技能对工作人员来说是新事物,他们发现这些技能颇具挑战性,尤其是对低文化水平的患者(技能集的可操作性)。卫生工作者将戒烟建议和行为支持视为其现有工作量之外的额外工作(关系整合)。虽然有强大的政策支持,但通过报告和监督来落实这一政策的力度有限(情境整合)。在接受干预的44名患者中,3个月后成功随访到27名;其中37%已戒烟(通过生化检验核实)。
传统上,低收入国家的初级卫生保健侧重于急性病护理;随着人们越来越认识到生活方式改变的必要性,卫生工作者必须培养新技能并与患者建立新关系。如果卫生工作者要对戒烟负责,就需要进行适当且定期的记录、报告、监督以及明确的领导。如果要在常规初级保健中将戒烟服务常态化,就必须持续开展这些卫生系统活动。