Suppr超能文献

在全科医疗中应用临床指南:对潜在并发症的定性研究

Applying clinical guidelines in general practice: a qualitative study of potential complications.

作者信息

Austad Bjarne, Hetlevik Irene, Mjølstad Bente Prytz, Helvik Anne-Sofie

机构信息

Sjøsiden Medical Centre, Trondheim, Norway.

General Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and General Practice, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PO Box 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 22;17:92. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0490-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines for single diseases often pose problems in general practice work with multimorbid patients. However, little research focuses on how general practice is affected by the demand to follow multiple guidelines. This study explored Norwegian general practitioners' (GPs') experiences with and reflections upon the consequences for general practice of applying multiple guidelines.

METHODS

Qualitative focus group study carried out in Mid-Norway. The study involved a purposeful sample of 25 Norwegian GPs from four pre-existing groups. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using systematic text condensation, i.e. applying a phenomenological approach.

RESULTS

The GPs' responses clustered around two major topics: 1) Complications for the GPs of applying multiple guidelines; and, 2) Complications for their patients when GPs apply multiple guidelines. For the GPs, applying multiple guidelines created a highly problematic situation as they felt obliged to implement guidelines that were not suited to their patients: too often, the map and the terrain did not match. They also experienced greater insecurity regarding their own practice which, they admitted, resulted in an increased tendency to practice 'defensive medicine'. For their patients, the GPs experienced that applying multiple guidelines increased the risk of polypharmacy, excessive non-pharmacological recommendations, a tendency toward medicalization and, for some, a reduction in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The GPs experienced negative consequences when obliged to apply a variety of single disease guidelines to multimorbid patients, including increased risk of polypharmacy and overtreatment. We believe patient-centered care and the GPs' courage to non-comply when necessary may aid in reducing these risks. Health care authorities and guideline developers need to be aware of the potential negative effects of applying a single disease focus in general practice, where multimorbidity is highly prevalent.

摘要

背景

单一疾病的临床指南在多病症患者的全科医疗工作中常常引发问题。然而,很少有研究关注遵循多种指南的要求对全科医疗产生的影响。本研究探讨了挪威全科医生(GP)对应用多种指南给全科医疗带来的后果的经验和思考。

方法

在挪威中部开展定性焦点小组研究。该研究从四个已有的小组中有目的地抽取了25名挪威全科医生作为样本。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用系统文本浓缩法(即应用现象学方法)进行分析。

结果

全科医生的回答集中在两个主要主题上:1)应用多种指南给全科医生带来的并发症;2)全科医生应用多种指南时给患者带来的并发症。对全科医生来说,应用多种指南造成了一个极具问题的局面,因为他们觉得有义务实施那些不适用于他们患者的指南:地图与地形往往不匹配的情况屡见不鲜。他们在自身的医疗实践中也感到更大的不安全感,他们承认,这导致了“防御性医疗”倾向的增加。对他们的患者来说,全科医生发现应用多种指南增加了多药联用的风险、过多的非药物治疗建议、医疗化倾向,对一些患者而言,还降低了生活质量。

结论

当必须对患有多种病症的患者应用各种单一疾病指南时,全科医生会经历负面后果,包括多药联用风险增加和过度治疗。我们认为以患者为中心的医疗以及全科医生在必要时不遵循指南的勇气可能有助于降低这些风险。医疗保健当局和指南制定者需要意识到在多病症非常普遍的全科医疗中专注单一疾病可能产生的潜在负面影响。

相似文献

1
Applying clinical guidelines in general practice: a qualitative study of potential complications.
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 22;17:92. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0490-3.
3
How GPs value guidelines applied to patients with multimorbidity: a qualitative study.
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 26;5(10):e007905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007905.
4
Problems and challenges in relation to the treatment of patients with multimorbidity: General practitioners' views and attitudes.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015 Jun;33(2):121-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1041828. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
5
Increasing workload in Norwegian general practice - a qualitative study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 May 21;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0952-5.
7
General practitioners' preferences for interventions to improve guideline adherence.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):820-6. doi: 10.1111/jep.12209. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
9
Swedish general practitioners' attitudes towards treatment guidelines - a qualitative study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Dec 16;15:199. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0199-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing TDApp: An AI-based clinical decision support system for ADHD treatment recommendations.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 22;16:1582746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1582746. eCollection 2025.
4
Policy Options for Reducing Defensive Medicine Behaviors: A Multi-Method Study.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Jul 29;38:86. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.86. eCollection 2024.
9
Polypharmacy and precision medicine.
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2023 Mar 10;1:e22. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.10. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Doing More vs. Doing Good: Aligning Our Ethical Principles From the Personal to the Societal.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Dec;169(12):1085-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2702.
2
Challenges of managing people with multimorbidity in today's healthcare systems.
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 14;16:129. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0344-4.
3
Problems and challenges in relation to the treatment of patients with multimorbidity: General practitioners' views and attitudes.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015 Jun;33(2):121-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1041828. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
4
In pursuit of normoglycaemia: the overtreatment of type 2 diabetes in general practice.
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jul;65(636):334-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685525.
8
The challenge of overdiagnosis begins with its definition.
BMJ. 2015 Mar 4;350:h869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h869.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验