Drysdale Kerryn, Creagh Nicola S, Nightingale Claire, Whop Lisa J, Kelly-Hanku Angela
Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW, Warrane (Sydney), Australia.
The Kirby Institute, UNSW, Warrane (Sydney), Australia.
Health Promot Int. 2025 May 13;40(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf058.
Health equity is a fundamental concern within the broader health promotion aim of creating equal opportunities for health and bringing health differentials down to the lowest level possible. Cervical screening is just one example of a preventative health program where a health promotion lens is required to address entrenched health inequities. We draw on theorizations of policy ecologies to provide a framework for better understanding the processes involved in operationalizing policy with greater inclusivity in language in health promotion. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 key informants between April and October 2022 to explore the operationalization of inclusive language in health promotion in the context of a national program to promote cervical screening to currently underscreening communities in Australia. Four thematic categories emphasize the balance required between demands and domains: (i) the need for clinical guidelines and flexibility in their translation and interpretation; (ii) organizational mandates, clinical practice, and patient-centred care; (iii) socio-cultural norms, behaviours, and attitudes amid politicized/ing milieus; and (iv) community preferences and the need for medical accuracy. As such, we identified how the operationalization of inclusive language in policy is influenced by and influences other domains where cervical screening is promoted. These findings hold wider implications for how the historical legacies of and contemporary need for 'women's health' can be maintained and respected amid demands for greater gender inclusion. At the same time, the failure to trace diverse and diffuse modes and contexts of operationalization may (re)produce health inequities in practice if left unexamined.
在旨在为健康创造平等机会并将健康差异降至尽可能最低水平的更广泛的健康促进目标中,健康公平是一个基本关切点。宫颈筛查只是预防性健康计划的一个例子,在这个计划中,需要从健康促进的角度来解决根深蒂固的健康不平等问题。我们借鉴政策生态理论,提供一个框架,以便更好地理解在健康促进中以更具包容性的语言实施政策所涉及的过程。2022年4月至10月期间,我们对29名关键信息提供者进行了28次半结构化访谈,以探讨在澳大利亚一项旨在向目前筛查不足的社区推广宫颈筛查的国家计划背景下,健康促进中包容性语言的实施情况。四个主题类别强调了需求与领域之间所需的平衡:(一)临床指南及其翻译和解释中灵活性的必要性;(二)组织指令、临床实践和以患者为中心的护理;(三)政治化环境中的社会文化规范、行为和态度;以及(四)社区偏好和医学准确性的需求。因此,我们确定了政策中包容性语言的实施如何受到推广宫颈筛查的其他领域的影响,以及它如何影响这些领域。这些发现对于在要求更大程度的性别包容的情况下,如何维护和尊重“妇女健康”的历史遗产和当代需求具有更广泛的意义。同时,如果不加以审视,未能追踪多样化和分散的实施模式及背景可能会在实践中(重新)产生健康不平等。