Windegger Tanja M, Lambooy Christine A, Hollis Leanne, Morwood Karen, Weston Helen, Fung Yoke Lin
School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.
School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia; Department of Cancer Care Service, Sunshine Coast, Hospital and Health Service,Queensland, Australia.
Transfus Med Rev. 2017 Jan;31(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) has an important role in minimizing infections and improving the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with immunodeficiency, who would otherwise experience recurrent infections. These plasma-derived products are available as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). The global demand for these products is growing rapidly and has placed pressure on supply. Some malignancies and their treatment (as well as other medical therapies) can lead to secondary hypogammaglobulinemia or secondary immunodeficiency (SID) requiring IRT. Although IVIg use in this cohort has well-established therapeutic benefits, little is known about SCIg use. A literature search in July 2015 found only 7 published articles on SCIg use. These articles found that both IRT modes had equivalent efficacy in regard to reduction of bacterial infections. In addition, SCIg was reported to produce higher serum IgG trough levels compared with IVIg on equivalent dosage with the added benefit of fewer adverse effects. Patient HRQoL reports demonstrate preference for SCIg because of reduced adverse effects and hospital visits. There are no health economic models published on SCIg use in SID, but models on primary immunodeficiency disease and IRT conclude that SCIg provided greater economic benefits than IVIg. The findings of this small number of reports suggest that SCIg therapy for patients with SID is likely to be beneficial for both the patient and health care providers. To substantiate wider use of SCIg in SID, larger and more detailed studies are needed to accurately quantify the effectiveness of SCIg.
免疫球蛋白替代疗法(IRT)在使免疫缺陷患者(否则会反复感染)的感染风险降至最低以及改善其健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)方面发挥着重要作用。这些血浆衍生产品有静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)或皮下注射免疫球蛋白(SCIg)两种形式。全球对这些产品的需求正在迅速增长,给供应带来了压力。一些恶性肿瘤及其治疗方法(以及其他医学疗法)可导致继发性低丙种球蛋白血症或继发性免疫缺陷(SID),需要进行IRT。虽然IVIg在这一群体中的使用具有公认的治疗益处,但关于SCIg的使用情况却知之甚少。2015年7月的文献检索仅发现7篇关于SCIg使用的已发表文章。这些文章发现,两种IRT模式在减少细菌感染方面具有同等疗效。此外,据报道,在同等剂量下,SCIg与IVIg相比能产生更高的血清IgG谷值水平,且副作用更少。患者HRQoL报告显示,由于副作用减少和医院就诊次数减少,患者更倾向于选择SCIg。目前尚无关于在SID中使用SCIg的卫生经济学模型,但关于原发性免疫缺陷疾病和IRT的模型得出结论,SCIg比IVIg能带来更大的经济效益。这少数报告的结果表明,对SID患者进行SCIg治疗可能对患者和医疗服务提供者都有益。为了证实SCIg在SID中更广泛的应用,需要进行更大规模、更详细的研究来准确量化SCIg的有效性。