• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用安德森卫生服务利用行为模型预测前列腺癌筛查情况。

Predictors of prostate cancer screening using Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.

作者信息

Ogunsanya Motolani E, Jiang Shan, Thach Andrew V, Bamgbade Benita A, Brown Carolyn M

机构信息

Health Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice Division, The College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Health Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice Division, The College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(12):529.e9-529.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.016
PMID:27450892
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of the study were to examine the prevalence of prostate cancer screening (PCS) in the United States and to identify predictors of PCS guided by Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use (ABM).

METHODS

PCS rates were analyzed in men (aged ≥40y) using 2014 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Descriptive analysis was conducted using sampling weights to determine the prevalence of PCS (i.e., had a prostate-specific antigen test). Multiple logistic regression within the framework of ABM was used to identify predictors of PCS. The ABM variables of predisposing (e.g., age), enabling (e.g., health insurance), and need (e.g., comorbidities) comprised the independent variables.

RESULTS

Among the 131,415 men, 62.4% (N = 82,014) reported that they had a prostate-specific antigen test in the last 2 years. Among predisposing factors, age, education, income, and employment status were significantly associated with undergoing PCS. Informed decision-making process, health care coverage, regular health care provider, and length of time since last routine checkup were significant enabling factors. Health care provider recommendation and previous cancer diagnosis were significant need factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Most older men in the United States had previously engaged in PCS. Several ABM variables were predictive of PCS and should be considered when developing future strategies to encourage PCS in at-risk men with the recommended life expectancies. Such strategies should also ensure that the decision to undergo PCS is an informed process between patients and their health care providers.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是调查美国前列腺癌筛查(PCS)的普及率,并确定以安德森卫生服务利用行为模型(ABM)为指导的PCS预测因素。

方法

使用行为危险因素监测系统2014年的数据对年龄≥40岁的男性的PCS率进行分析。使用抽样权重进行描述性分析,以确定PCS的普及率(即进行了前列腺特异性抗原检测)。在ABM框架内使用多重逻辑回归来确定PCS的预测因素。易患因素(如年龄)、促成因素(如医疗保险)和需求因素(如合并症)的ABM变量构成自变量。

结果

在131,415名男性中,62.4%(N = 82,014)报告称他们在过去2年中进行了前列腺特异性抗原检测。在易患因素中,年龄、教育程度、收入和就业状况与接受PCS显著相关。知情决策过程、医疗保险覆盖范围、定期的医疗保健提供者以及自上次常规检查以来的时间长度是重要的促成因素。医疗保健提供者的建议和先前的癌症诊断是重要的需求因素。

结论

美国大多数老年男性此前都进行过PCS。几个ABM变量可预测PCS,在制定未来策略以鼓励预期寿命符合推荐标准的高危男性进行PCS时应予以考虑。此类策略还应确保接受PCS的决定是患者与其医疗保健提供者之间的知情过程。

相似文献

1
Predictors of prostate cancer screening using Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.使用安德森卫生服务利用行为模型预测前列腺癌筛查情况。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(12):529.e9-529.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
2
Health disparities in clinical practice patterns for prostate cancer screening by geographic regions in the United States: a multilevel modeling analysis.美国不同地理区域前列腺癌筛查的临床实践模式中的健康差异:多层次建模分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013 Jun;16(2):193-203. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.3. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
3
Socioeconomic status and utilization of health care services in Canada and the United States: findings from a binational health survey.加拿大和美国的社会经济地位与医疗保健服务利用情况:一项双边健康调查的结果
Med Care. 2009 Nov;47(11):1136-46. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181adcbe9.
4
Prostate cancer screening decision-making in three states: 2013 behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis.三个州的前列腺癌筛查决策:2013年行为危险因素监测系统分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Mar;28(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0860-8. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
Use of the prostate-specific antigen test among men aged 75 years or older in the United States: 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.美国 75 岁及以上男性中前列腺特异性抗原检测的使用情况:2006 年行为风险因素监测系统。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul;7(4):A84. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
6
Factors associated with the health care cost in older Australian women with arthritis: an application of the Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Services Use.澳大利亚老年关节炎女性患者医疗保健费用的相关因素:安德森卫生服务利用行为模型的应用
Public Health. 2016 May;134:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.11.018. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Behavioral associations between prostate and colon cancer screening.前列腺癌和结肠癌筛查之间的行为关联。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Feb;200(2):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.10.015.
8
National trends in prostate cancer screening among older American men with limited 9-year life expectancies: evidence of an increased need for shared decision making.美国预期寿命有限的老年男性中前列腺癌筛查的国家趋势:需要更多共享决策的证据。
Cancer. 2014 May 15;120(10):1491-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28600. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
9
The influence of physician recommendation on prostate-specific antigen screening.医生建议对前列腺特异性抗原筛查的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Oct;33(10):424.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
10
Prostate cancer screening and informed decision-making: provider and patient perspectives.前列腺癌筛查与知情决策:提供者与患者视角。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011 Jun;14(2):155-61. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2010.55. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health service utilization among pregnant and postpartum women: status, determinants, and insights from a mixed-methods study.孕期及产后女性的心理健康服务利用情况:一项混合方法研究的现状、决定因素及见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 26;25(1):1942. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23132-1.
2
Does inclusion of neighborhood variables improve clinical risk prediction for advanced prostate cancer in Black and White men?纳入邻里变量是否能改善黑人和白人男性晚期前列腺癌的临床风险预测?
Urol Oncol. 2025 May;43(5):334.e17-334.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.021. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
3
Multidimensional Healthcare Access Barriers to Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing: A Nation-Wide Panel Study in the United States From 2006 to 2020.
多维前列腺特异性抗原检测的医疗保健获取障碍:2006 年至 2020 年美国全国面板研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Nov;13(21):e70358. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70358.
4
Association Between Body Mass Index and Cancer Screening Adherence Among Latinas in the United States and Puerto Rico.美国和波多黎各拉丁裔女性的体重指数与癌症筛查依从性之间的关联。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 May 31;3(1):552-562. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0153. eCollection 2022.
5
Retention in Community Health Screening among Taiwanese Adults: A 9-Year Prospective Cohort Study.台湾成年人社区健康筛查的保留率:一项为期 9 年的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 2;19(11):6813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116813.
6
Dairy foods, calcium intakes, and risk of incident prostate cancer in Adventist Health Study-2.乳制品、钙摄入量与 Adventist Health Study-2 中前列腺癌发病风险的关系。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Aug 4;116(2):314-324. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac093.
7
Factors Affecting Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Men: Systematic Review.影响男性 HPV 疫苗接种的因素:系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Apr 26;8(4):e34070. doi: 10.2196/34070.
8
Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening According to Health Professional Counseling and Age in the United States.美国基于健康专业人士咨询和年龄的前列腺特异性抗原筛查
Prostate Cancer. 2022 Jan 6;2022:8646314. doi: 10.1155/2022/8646314. eCollection 2022.
9
Attitude Toward Prostate Cancer Screening in Hong Kong: The Importance of Perceived Consequence and Anticipated Regret.香港人对前列腺癌筛查的态度:感知后果和预期遗憾的重要性。
Am J Mens Health. 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):15579883211051442. doi: 10.1177/15579883211051442.
10
Factors Associated with Breast Cancer Screening Adherence among Church-Going African American Women.与参加教会的非裔美国女性乳腺癌筛查依从性相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):8494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168494.