Suppr超能文献

三个州的前列腺癌筛查决策:2013年行为危险因素监测系统分析

Prostate cancer screening decision-making in three states: 2013 behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis.

作者信息

Li Jun, Hall Ingrid J, Zhao Guixiang

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, 4770 Buford Hwy, Mail Stop F-76, Atlanta, GA, 30341, Georgia.

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Mar;28(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0860-8. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Given the discordant prostate cancer screening recommendations in the United States, shared decision-making (SDM) has become increasingly important. The objectives of this study were to determine who made the final decision to obtain prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening and identify factors associated with the screening decision made by both patients and their health care providers.

METHODS

Using the 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from Delaware, Hawaii, and Massachusetts, we calculated weighted percentages of SDM. Associations between the SDM and sociodemographic, lifestyle, access to care, and PSA testing-related factors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 2,248 men aged 40 years or older who ever had a PSA-based screening in these three states. Only 36% of them made their prostate cancer screening decision jointly with their health care provider. Multivariate analyses showed that men who were married/living together or had a college degree and above were more likely to report having SDM than men who were never married or had less than high school education (P = 0.02 and 0.002). Moreover, men whose most recent PSA test occurred within the past year were more likely to report SDM than men who had the test done more than 2 years ago (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of screening decisions were made by the patient or health care provider alone in these three states, not jointly, as recommended. Our study points to the need to promote SDM among patients and their health care providers before PSA testing.

摘要

引言

鉴于美国前列腺癌筛查建议存在差异,共同决策(SDM)变得愈发重要。本研究的目的是确定谁最终决定进行基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的筛查,并识别与患者及其医疗服务提供者所做筛查决策相关的因素。

方法

利用来自特拉华州、夏威夷州和马萨诸塞州的2013年行为危险因素监测系统数据,我们计算了共同决策的加权百分比。使用多变量逻辑回归评估共同决策与社会人口统计学、生活方式、医疗服务可及性以及PSA检测相关因素之间的关联。

结果

在这三个州,有2248名40岁及以上的男性曾进行过基于PSA的筛查。其中只有36%的人与他们的医疗服务提供者共同做出前列腺癌筛查决策。多变量分析表明,已婚/同居或拥有大学及以上学历的男性比未婚或高中以下学历的男性更有可能报告进行了共同决策(P = 0.02和0.002)。此外,最近一次PSA检测在过去一年内进行的男性比两年多以前进行检测的男性更有可能报告进行了共同决策(P = 0.02)。

结论

在这三个州,大多数筛查决策是由患者或医疗服务提供者单独做出的,而非如建议的那样共同做出。我们的研究指出,在进行PSA检测之前,有必要在患者及其医疗服务提供者中推广共同决策。

相似文献

3
Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查中与共同决策相关的差异。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):1008-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 15.

本文引用的文献

3
Decision making and prostate cancer screening.决策与前列腺癌筛查。
Urol Clin North Am. 2014 May;41(2):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
8
Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.早期前列腺癌检测:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119. Epub 2013 May 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验