• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prostate cancer screening decision-making in three states: 2013 behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis.三个州的前列腺癌筛查决策:2013年行为危险因素监测系统分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Mar;28(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0860-8. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Impact of health literacy on shared decision making for prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States.健康素养对美国前列腺特异性抗原筛查中共同决策的影响。
Cancer. 2021 Jan 15;127(2):249-256. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33239. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查中与共同决策相关的差异。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):1008-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 15.
4
Pre-screening Discussions and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查的预筛查讨论及前列腺特异性抗原检测
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 May 18.
5
Examination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in military and civilian men: analysis of the 2018 behavioral risk factor surveillance system.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查在军人和普通男性中的应用:2018 年行为风险因素监测系统分析。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Mar;33(3):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01533-y. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
6
"Shared decision-making" for prostate cancer screening: Is it a marker of quality preventative healthcare?“共同决策”用于前列腺癌筛查:是否为高质量预防性保健的标志?
Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;88:102492. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102492. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
7
Randomized trial of community health worker-led decision coaching to promote shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening among Black male patients and their providers.由社区卫生工作者主导的决策指导促进黑人男性患者及其医疗服务提供者共同参与前列腺癌筛查决策的随机试验。
Trials. 2021 Feb 10;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05064-4.
8
Limited Evidence of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Audio-Recorded Primary Care Visits Among Black Men and their Healthcare Providers.在黑人男性及其医疗保健提供者的初级保健就诊中,音频记录的前列腺癌筛查中共享决策的证据有限。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Oct;26(5):866-877. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01606-5. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
9
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.国家关于在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中使用共同决策的证据。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539.
10
Use of the prostate-specific antigen test among men aged 75 years or older in the United States: 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.美国 75 岁及以上男性中前列腺特异性抗原检测的使用情况:2006 年行为风险因素监测系统。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul;7(4):A84. Epub 2010 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital rectal examination and its associated factors in the early detection of prostate cancer: a cross-sectional population-based study.数字直肠检查及其在前列腺癌早期检测中的相关因素:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):1573. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7946-z.
2
The Influence of Decision Aids on Prostate Cancer Screening Preferences: A Randomized Survey Study.决策辅助工具对前列腺癌筛查偏好的影响:一项随机调查研究。
J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):1048-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.093. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Prostate cancer surveillance by occupation and industry: the Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC).职业和行业的前列腺癌监测:加拿大人口普查健康与环境队列(CanCHEC)。
Cancer Med. 2018 Apr;7(4):1468-1478. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1358. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
4
Making the grade: The newest US Preventive Services Task Force prostate cancer screening recommendation.达标:美国最新预防服务工作组前列腺癌筛查建议。
Cancer. 2017 Oct 15;123(20):3875-3878. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30941. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-screening Discussions and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查的预筛查讨论及前列腺特异性抗原检测
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 May 18.
2
Lack of shared decision making in cancer screening discussions: results from a national survey.癌症筛查讨论中缺乏共享决策:一项全国性调查的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
3
Decision making and prostate cancer screening.决策与前列腺癌筛查。
Urol Clin North Am. 2014 May;41(2):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
4
Cancer screening in the United States, 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.美国 2014 年癌症筛查:对当前美国癌症协会指南和癌症筛查当前问题的回顾。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):30-51. doi: 10.3322/caac.21212. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
5
Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial.基于决策辅助工具与常规护理的前列腺癌筛查决策:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1704-12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9253.
6
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.国家关于在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中使用共同决策的证据。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539.
7
Shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen testing with men older than 70 years.70 岁以上男性前列腺特异性抗原检测的共同决策。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):401-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120267.
8
Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.早期前列腺癌检测:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119. Epub 2013 May 6.
9
Discussing uncertainty and risk in primary care: recommendations of a multi-disciplinary panel regarding communication around prostate cancer screening.探讨初级保健中的不确定性和风险:多学科小组就前列腺癌筛查沟通提出的建议。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1410-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2419-z. Epub 2013 May 7.
10
Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.前列腺癌筛查:美国医师学院临床指南委员会的指导声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 May 21;158(10):761-769. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00633.

三个州的前列腺癌筛查决策:2013年行为危险因素监测系统分析

Prostate cancer screening decision-making in three states: 2013 behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis.

作者信息

Li Jun, Hall Ingrid J, Zhao Guixiang

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, 4770 Buford Hwy, Mail Stop F-76, Atlanta, GA, 30341, Georgia.

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Mar;28(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0860-8. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-017-0860-8
PMID:28210882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6065503/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Given the discordant prostate cancer screening recommendations in the United States, shared decision-making (SDM) has become increasingly important. The objectives of this study were to determine who made the final decision to obtain prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening and identify factors associated with the screening decision made by both patients and their health care providers.

METHODS

Using the 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from Delaware, Hawaii, and Massachusetts, we calculated weighted percentages of SDM. Associations between the SDM and sociodemographic, lifestyle, access to care, and PSA testing-related factors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 2,248 men aged 40 years or older who ever had a PSA-based screening in these three states. Only 36% of them made their prostate cancer screening decision jointly with their health care provider. Multivariate analyses showed that men who were married/living together or had a college degree and above were more likely to report having SDM than men who were never married or had less than high school education (P = 0.02 and 0.002). Moreover, men whose most recent PSA test occurred within the past year were more likely to report SDM than men who had the test done more than 2 years ago (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of screening decisions were made by the patient or health care provider alone in these three states, not jointly, as recommended. Our study points to the need to promote SDM among patients and their health care providers before PSA testing.

摘要

引言

鉴于美国前列腺癌筛查建议存在差异,共同决策(SDM)变得愈发重要。本研究的目的是确定谁最终决定进行基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的筛查,并识别与患者及其医疗服务提供者所做筛查决策相关的因素。

方法

利用来自特拉华州、夏威夷州和马萨诸塞州的2013年行为危险因素监测系统数据,我们计算了共同决策的加权百分比。使用多变量逻辑回归评估共同决策与社会人口统计学、生活方式、医疗服务可及性以及PSA检测相关因素之间的关联。

结果

在这三个州,有2248名40岁及以上的男性曾进行过基于PSA的筛查。其中只有36%的人与他们的医疗服务提供者共同做出前列腺癌筛查决策。多变量分析表明,已婚/同居或拥有大学及以上学历的男性比未婚或高中以下学历的男性更有可能报告进行了共同决策(P = 0.02和0.002)。此外,最近一次PSA检测在过去一年内进行的男性比两年多以前进行检测的男性更有可能报告进行了共同决策(P = 0.02)。

结论

在这三个州,大多数筛查决策是由患者或医疗服务提供者单独做出的,而非如建议的那样共同做出。我们的研究指出,在进行PSA检测之前,有必要在患者及其医疗服务提供者中推广共同决策。