Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, 470 Hitchcock Hall, 2070 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, 470 Hitchcock Hall, 2070 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 15;571:834-54. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.061. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Two full-scale coal mine reclamation projects using coal combustion residues (CCRs) were recently carried out at highwall pit complexes near the Conesville and Cardinal coal-fired power plants owned by American Electric Power. The environment impacts of the reclamation projects were examined by regularly monitoring the leaching characteristics of the backfilling CCRs and the water quality of the uppermost aquifers underlying the sites. With over five years of field monitoring, it shows that the water quality at both demonstration sites had changed since the reclamation began. By analyzing the change of the hydrogeochemical properties, it was concluded that the water quality impact observed at the Conesville Five Points site was unlikely due to the seepage of FGD material leachates. Reclamation activities, such as logging, grading, and dewatering changed the hydrogeological conditions and resulted in the observed water quality changes. The same hydrogeological effect on water quality was also found at the Cardinal Star Ridge site during the early stage of the reclamation (approximately the first 22months). Subsequent measurements showed the water quality to be strongly influenced by the water in the reclaimed highwall pit. Despite the changes to the water quality, the impacts are insignificant and temporary. None of the constitutes showed concentration levels higher than the regulatory leaching limits set by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Mineral Resources Management for utilizing CCRs in mined land reclamation. Compared to the local aquifers, the concentrations of eleven selected constituents remained at comparable levels throughout the study period. There are four constituents (i.e., As, Be, Sb, and Tl) that exceeded their respective MCLs after the reclamation began. These detections were found shortly (i.e., within 2years) after the reclamation began and decreased to the levels either lower than the respective detection limits or similar to the background levels.
最近,美国电力公司在康斯维尔和红衣主教燃煤电厂附近的高壁坑场进行了两个使用煤燃烧残渣(CCR)的全面煤矿复垦项目。通过定期监测回填 CCR 的浸出特性和场地下最上层含水层的水质,检查了复垦项目的环境影响。经过五年多的现场监测,显示自复垦开始以来,两个示范场地的水质都发生了变化。通过分析水地球化学性质的变化,可以得出结论,在康斯维尔五点现场观察到的水质影响不太可能是由于 FGD 材料浸出液的渗漏造成的。复垦活动,如伐木、平整土地和脱水,改变了水文地质条件,导致了观察到的水质变化。在复垦早期(大约前 22 个月),红衣主教星岭场地也发现了对水质有相同的水文地质影响。随后的测量表明,水质受到回填高壁坑中水的强烈影响。尽管水质发生了变化,但影响是微不足道的且是暂时的。没有一种成分的浓度高于俄亥俄州自然资源部矿产资源管理司为利用 CCR 进行矿区复垦而设定的监管浸出限值。与当地含水层相比,在整个研究期间,十一种选定成分的浓度保持在可比水平。有四个成分(即 As、Be、Sb 和 Tl)在复垦开始后超过了各自的 MCL。这些检测结果是在复垦开始后不久(即 2 年内)发现的,并且降低到低于各自检测限或与背景水平相似的水平。