Hastings Victoria, McCallister Adrienne Marie, Curtis Sarah A, Valant Roseanna J, Yao Sheldon
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Aug 1;116(8):502-9. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.103.
Pain is one of the most common postpartum complaints by women in the United States, and the pain varies in its location. Research on intervention strategies for postpartum pain has focused primarily on the lower back, but pain management for other types of postpartum pain remains unclear.
To investigate the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on postpartum pain; the location, quality, and timing of pain; and the difference in pain between vaginal and cesarean delivery.
Postpartum patients who reported having pain were recruited at St Barnabas Hospital in Bronx, New York. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire was administered along with a screening questionnaire. Second- or third-year residents in neuromusculoskeletal medicine and osteopathic manipulative medicine examined patients and then diagnosed and managed somatic dysfunction with OMT for approximately 25 minutes. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire was again administered after OMT. Paired t tests and McNemar tests were used to analyze changes before and after OMT for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Differences in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores between patients who had vaginal vs cesarean delivery were tested using analysis of variance, and group differences in pain location were tested using a Pearson χ2 test.
A total of 59 patients were included in the study. The mean VAS score for pain was 5.0 before OMT and 2.9 after OMT (P<.001). The VAS scores before OMT significantly differed between patients who had a vaginal delivery and those who had a cesarean delivery (P<.001), but the mean decrease in VAS score was similar in both groups. Decreases in low back pain (34 [57.6%] before and 16 [27.1%] after OMT), abdominal pain (32 [54.2%] before and 22 [37.3%] after OMT), and vaginal pain (11 [18.6%] before and 5 [8.5%] after OMT) were reported after OMT (P<.05).
Preliminary results demonstrate that OMT is efficacious for postpartum pain management. The lack of a control group precludes the ability to make causal claims. Future studies are needed to solidify OMT efficacy and generalizability.
疼痛是美国女性产后最常见的主诉之一,且疼痛部位各不相同。产后疼痛干预策略的研究主要集中在下背部,但其他类型产后疼痛的疼痛管理仍不明确。
探讨整骨手法治疗(OMT)对产后疼痛的影响;疼痛的部位、性质和时间;以及阴道分娩和剖宫产之间的疼痛差异。
在纽约布朗克斯的圣巴纳巴斯医院招募报告有疼痛的产后患者。发放简短麦吉尔疼痛问卷以及一份筛查问卷。神经肌肉骨骼医学和整骨手法医学的二、三年级住院医师对患者进行检查,然后诊断并使用OMT治疗躯体功能障碍约25分钟。OMT治疗后再次发放简短麦吉尔疼痛问卷。配对t检验和 McNemar检验分别用于分析OMT前后连续变量和分类变量的变化。使用方差分析检验阴道分娩和剖宫产患者视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分的差异,使用Pearson χ2检验检验疼痛部位的组间差异。
共有59名患者纳入研究。OMT前疼痛的平均VAS评分为5.0,OMT后为2.9(P<.001)。阴道分娩患者和剖宫产患者OMT前的VAS评分有显著差异(P<.001),但两组VAS评分的平均降低幅度相似。OMT后报告下背痛(OMT前34例[57.6%],OMT后16例[27.1%])、腹痛(OMT前32例[54.2%],OMT后22例[37.3%])和阴道痛(OMT前11例[18.6%],OMT后5例[8.5%])有所减轻(P<.05)。
初步结果表明,OMT对产后疼痛管理有效。缺乏对照组使得无法做出因果关系的断言。需要进一步的研究来巩固OMT的疗效和普遍性。