Santana Jamilly C V, Santos Victor S, Gurgel Ricardo Q, Santana Julianne C V, Reis Francisco P, Cuevas Luis E, Feitosa Vera L C
Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
Tiradentes University, Aracaju, Brazil.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Oct 5;95(4):756-759. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0366. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
Neuropathic pain (NP) often occurs during the course of leprosy, and screening tools to differentiate NP from non-NP are often used. However, their performance varies in different settings. The most frequently used scales are the Douleur Neuropathique in 4 questions (DN4) and the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) questionnaires. Thus, we conducted a study to evaluate the agreement between DN4 and LANSS questionnaires to classify NP in 195 leprosy patients attending two reference centers in Sergipe, Brazil. The DN4 and LANSS classified 166 and 110 patients, respectively, as having NP. One hundred and seven (54.8%) were classified as NP by both questionnaires; 59 (30.2%) solely by the DN4 questionnaire and three (1.5%) solely by the LANSS. The agreement of the questionnaires was 66.2% (weak agreement, Kappa = 0.30). Although both questionnaires identified a high proportion of NP, the development of more robust instruments is necessary to ensure the accuracy of diagnosis of leprosy patients classified as having NP.
神经性疼痛(NP)常在麻风病程中出现,人们常使用一些筛查工具来区分NP与非NP。然而,它们在不同环境中的表现有所不同。最常用的量表是四问题神经病理性疼痛量表(DN4)和利兹神经病理性症状与体征评估量表(LANSS)问卷。因此,我们开展了一项研究,以评估在巴西塞尔希培州两个参考中心就诊的195例麻风患者中,DN4和LANSS问卷在对NP进行分类时的一致性。DN4和LANSS分别将166例和110例患者分类为患有NP。107例(54.8%)患者被两个问卷均分类为患有NP;59例(30.2%)仅被DN4问卷分类为患有NP,3例(1.5%)仅被LANSS问卷分类为患有NP。问卷的一致性为66.2%(一致性较弱,kappa值 = 0.30)。尽管两个问卷都识别出了高比例的NP患者,但仍需要开发更可靠的工具,以确保对被分类为患有NP的麻风患者诊断的准确性。