Suppr超能文献

成年人皮肤癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。

Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

机构信息

Group Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):436-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5415.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Skin cancer, primarily melanoma, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force regarding clinical skin cancer screening among adults.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies published from January 1, 1995, through June 1, 2015, with surveillance through February 16, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations 15 years and older at general risk for skin cancer.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Relevant data were abstracted, and study quality was rated.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Melanoma incidence and mortality, harms from cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy, and stage distribution.

RESULTS

No randomized clinical trials were identified. There was limited evidence on the association between skin cancer screening and mortality. A German ecologic study (n = 360,288) found a decrease of 0.8 per 100,000 melanoma deaths in a region with population-based skin cancer screening compared with no change or slight increases in comparison regions. The number of excisions needed to detect 1 skin cancer from clinical visual skin examinations varied by age and sex; for example, 22 for women 65 years or older compared with 41 for women aged 20 to 34 years. In 2 studies of performing visual skin examination, sensitivity to detect melanoma was 40.2% and specificity was 86.1% when conducted by primary care physicians (n = 16,383). Sensitivity was 49.0% and specificity was 97.6% when skin examinations were performed by dermatologists (n = 7436). In a case-control study of melanoma (n = 7586), cases diagnosed with thicker lesions (>0.75 mm) had an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98) for receipt of a physician skin examination in the prior 3 years compared with controls. Eight cohort studies (n = 236,485) demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between the degree of disease involvement at diagnosis and melanoma mortality, regardless of the characterization of the stage or lesion thickness. Tumor thickness greater than 4.0 mm was associated with increased melanoma mortality compared with thinner lesions, and late stage at diagnosis was associated with increased all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Only limited evidence was identified for skin cancer screening, particularly regarding potential benefit of skin cancer screening on melanoma mortality. Future research on skin cancer screening should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of targeted screening in those considered to be at higher risk for skin cancer.

摘要

重要提示

皮肤癌,尤其是黑色素瘤,是导致美国发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。

目的

为美国预防服务工作组提供一项有关成年人临床皮肤癌筛查的最新系统评价。

数据来源

从 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 1 日,通过 2016 年 2 月 16 日的监测,在 MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中搜索了相关研究。

研究选择

针对普通皮肤癌风险 15 岁及以上的无症状人群进行的英语研究。

数据提取和综合

提取了相关数据,并对研究质量进行了评价。

主要结果和措施

黑色素瘤发病率和死亡率、癌症筛查的危害、诊断准确性和分期分布。

结果

没有发现随机临床试验。皮肤癌筛查与死亡率之间的关联证据有限。一项德国的生态学研究(n=360288)发现,与没有改变或略有增加的比较区域相比,在进行基于人群的皮肤癌筛查的区域,每 100000 例黑色素瘤死亡人数减少了 0.8 例。从临床视觉皮肤检查中检测到 1 例皮肤癌所需的切除数因年龄和性别而异;例如,65 岁及以上的女性为 22 例,而 20 至 34 岁的女性为 41 例。在 2 项关于进行视觉皮肤检查的研究中,初级保健医生进行皮肤检查时的敏感性为 40.2%,特异性为 86.1%(n=16383)。皮肤科医生进行皮肤检查时,敏感性为 49.0%,特异性为 97.6%(n=7436)。在一项黑色素瘤病例对照研究(n=7586)中,与对照组相比,诊断为较厚病变(>0.75 毫米)的病例在前 3 年接受医生皮肤检查的几率为 0.86(95%CI,0.75-0.98)。八项队列研究(n=236485)表明,无论病变分期或厚度如何,诊断时疾病受累程度与黑色素瘤死亡率之间存在统计学显著关系。与较薄的病变相比,肿瘤厚度大于 4.0 毫米与黑色素瘤死亡率增加相关,而晚期诊断与全因死亡率增加相关。

结论和相关性

仅确定了有限的皮肤癌筛查证据,特别是关于皮肤癌筛查对黑色素瘤死亡率的潜在益处。未来的皮肤癌筛查研究应侧重于评估针对被认为有更高皮肤癌风险的人群进行有针对性筛查的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验