Suppr超能文献

四周重复吸入未结合偶氮二甲酰胺对豚鼠特异性和非特异性气道敏感性的影响。

Effect of four-week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamide on specific and non-specific airway sensitivity of the guinea pig.

作者信息

Gerlach R F, Medinsky M A, Hobbs C H, Bice D E, Bechtold W E, Cheng Y S, Gillett N A, Birnbaum L S, Mauderly J L

机构信息

Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87185.

出版信息

J Appl Toxicol. 1989 Jun;9(3):145-53. doi: 10.1002/jat.2550090303.

Abstract

Reports of respiratory problems among industrial workers exposed repeatedly by inhalation to azodicarbonamide (ADA) raised concern that ADA might be a pulmonary sensitizer. We used a non-invasive method for measuring specific airway conductance to evaluate the potential for repeated inhalation of unconjugated ADA to cause specific or non-specific pulmonary sensitization in the guinea pig. Two groups of male Hartley guinea pigs were exposed 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks to aerosolized ADA at 51 or 200 mg/m3, or to filtered air as controls. One group was tested for specific sensitization to ADA by measuring specific airway conductance during inhalation challenge with ADA before and on the third day after the 4-week ADA exposure. The ADA concentrations for the challenges were identical to the repeated exposure concentrations (51 or 200 mg/m3, 200 mg/m3 for controls). The other group was tested for non-specific airway sensitization by inhalation challenge with aerosolized histamine before and after the 4-week ADA exposure. Histamine was administered in stepwise increasing concentrations to elicit an airway response in each guinea pig. Skin tests for immunological responses to ADA, body weight and histopathology of the respiratory tract and skin test sites were also evaluated. The 4-week exposure to ADA did not result in either specific or non-specific airway sensitization. The ADA exposure did not induce positive skin reactions, influence body weight or cause histopathological responses. These results indicate that ADA, acting alone (i.e. not conjugated to a protein), is not a pulmonary sensitizer in the guinea pig exposed repeatedly for 4 weeks and challenged to simulate a 'Monday morning' exposure.

摘要

有报告称,反复吸入偶氮二甲酰胺(ADA)的产业工人出现了呼吸道问题,这引发了人们对ADA可能是一种肺部致敏剂的担忧。我们采用一种非侵入性方法来测量比气道传导率,以评估豚鼠反复吸入未结合的ADA导致特异性或非特异性肺部致敏的可能性。将两组雄性Hartley豚鼠每天暴露6小时,每周暴露5天,持续4周,使其吸入浓度为51或200毫克/立方米的雾化ADA,或作为对照吸入过滤空气。一组豚鼠在4周ADA暴露前和暴露后的第三天,通过在吸入ADA激发试验期间测量比气道传导率,来检测对ADA的特异性致敏情况。激发试验中的ADA浓度与反复暴露浓度相同(51或200毫克/立方米,对照组为200毫克/立方米)。另一组豚鼠在4周ADA暴露前后,通过雾化组胺吸入激发试验来检测非特异性气道致敏情况。逐步增加组胺浓度,以引发每只豚鼠的气道反应。还评估了对ADA的免疫反应皮肤试验、体重以及呼吸道和皮肤试验部位的组织病理学情况。4周的ADA暴露未导致特异性或非特异性气道致敏。ADA暴露未引起阳性皮肤反应,未影响体重,也未导致组织病理学反应。这些结果表明,单独作用(即未与蛋白质结合)的ADA,在反复暴露4周并接受激发试验以模拟“周一早晨”暴露的豚鼠中,不是一种肺部致敏剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验