McGinnes Rosemary A, Hutton Jennie E, Weiland Tracey J, Fatovich Daniel M, Egerton-Warburton Diana
School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emergency Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Dec;28(6):629-640. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12624. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
To assess the effectiveness of ultra-brief interventions (ultra-BI) or technology-involved preventive measures in the ED to reduce alcohol harm and risky drinking. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EBM reviews were searched for articles published between 1996 and 2015. Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials, which compared an ultra-BI with screening, standard care or minimal intervention for adults and adolescents at risk for alcohol-related harm presenting to an ED, were included. Outcomes of interest were frequency of alcohol consumption, quantity of alcohol consumed, binge drinking and ED representation. Thirteen studies (nine single centre and four multicentre) were included. Six studies showed a significant reduction in the quantity consumed with intermediate effect size at 3 months (d = -0.40) and small effect size at 12 months (d = -0.15). Two studies showed a significant reduction in binge drinking with small effect size at 3 months (d = -0.12) and 12 months (d = -0.09). No studies showed an effect on frequency of alcohol consumption or ED representation. Heterogeneity in study design, definition of risky, harmful or hazardous alcohol use, intervention types, outcomes, outcome timeframes and outcome measures prevented the performance of quantitative meta-analysis. Despite its limited effectiveness in reducing alcohol use in the short-term, with the large number of people attending EDs with risky drinking, the use of an effective ultra-BI would have the potential to have a measurable population effect.
评估急诊室中超简短干预措施(ultra - BI)或涉及技术的预防措施在减少酒精危害和危险饮酒方面的有效性。检索了Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL和循证医学综述,查找1996年至2015年期间发表的文章。纳入了随机对照试验和半随机试验,这些试验比较了超简短干预措施与筛查、标准护理或对就诊于急诊室的有酒精相关危害风险的成人及青少年的最小干预措施。感兴趣的结果包括饮酒频率、饮酒量、暴饮以及急诊就诊情况。共纳入13项研究(9项单中心研究和4项多中心研究)。6项研究显示,3个月时饮酒量显著减少,效应量中等(d = -0.40),12个月时效应量较小(d = -0.15)。2项研究显示,3个月(d = -0.12)和12个月(d = -0.09)时暴饮显著减少,效应量较小。没有研究显示对饮酒频率或急诊就诊情况有影响。研究设计、危险、有害或危险饮酒的定义、干预类型、结果、结果时间框架和结果测量方法的异质性妨碍了定量荟萃分析的进行。尽管超简短干预措施在短期内减少饮酒方面效果有限,但鉴于大量有危险饮酒行为的人前往急诊室就诊,使用有效的超简短干预措施可能会对总体人群产生可衡量的影响。