Villa Scott M, Goodman Graham B, Ruff James S, Clayton Dale H
Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Biol Lett. 2016 Jul;12(7). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0362.
For birds, the first line of defence against ectoparasites is preening. The effectiveness of self-preening for ectoparasite control is well known. By contrast, the ectoparasite control function of allopreening-in which one birds preens another-has not been rigorously tested. We infested captive pigeons with identical numbers of parasitic lice, and then compared rates of allopreening to the abundance of lice on the birds over time. We documented a negative relationship between rates of allopreening and the number of lice on birds. Moreover, we found that allopreening was a better predictor of louse abundance than self-preening. Our data suggest that allopreening may be a more important means of ectoparasite defence than self-preening when birds live in groups. Our results have important implications for the evolution of social behaviour.
对于鸟类来说,抵御体外寄生虫的第一道防线是梳理羽毛。自我梳理羽毛对控制体外寄生虫的有效性是众所周知的。相比之下,异体梳理(即一只鸟为另一只鸟梳理羽毛)的体外寄生虫控制功能尚未得到严格测试。我们给圈养的鸽子感染数量相同的寄生虱,然后比较异体梳理的频率与随着时间推移鸟类身上虱子数量的关系。我们记录到异体梳理频率与鸟类身上虱子数量之间呈负相关。此外,我们发现异体梳理比自我梳理更能预测虱子的数量。我们的数据表明,当鸟类群居时,异体梳理可能是比自我梳理更重要的抵御体外寄生虫的方式。我们的研究结果对社会行为的进化具有重要意义。