Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA, USA.
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiessen, Germany.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep;31(9):711-719. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
To make progress scientists need to know what other researchers have found and how they found it. However, transparency is often insufficient across much of ecology and evolution. Researchers often fail to report results and methods in detail sufficient to permit interpretation and meta-analysis, and many results go entirely unreported. Further, these unreported results are often a biased subset. Thus the conclusions we can draw from the published literature are themselves often biased and sometimes might be entirely incorrect. Fortunately there is a movement across empirical disciplines, and now within ecology and evolution, to shape editorial policies to better promote transparency. This can be done by either requiring more disclosure by scientists or by developing incentives to encourage disclosure.
为了取得进展,科学家们需要了解其他研究人员的发现以及他们是如何发现的。然而,在生态学和进化学领域,透明度往往不够。研究人员经常未能详细报告足以进行解释和元分析的结果和方法,许多结果根本没有报告。此外,这些未报告的结果往往是有偏的子集。因此,我们从已发表的文献中得出的结论本身往往也有偏差,有时甚至可能完全不正确。幸运的是,跨经验学科的运动,现在在生态学和进化学领域,正在制定编辑政策以更好地促进透明度。这可以通过要求科学家进行更多的披露或通过制定激励措施来鼓励披露来实现。