Link Mark S, Haïssaguerre Michel, Natale Andrea
From Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (M.S.L.); Liryc Institute (Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute), Hopital Cardiologique du Haut-Leveque, CHU Bordeaux, Universite de Bordeaux, France (M.H.); and Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin (A.N.).
Circulation. 2016 Jul 26;134(4):339-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021727.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered by cardiologists and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for AF include age, male sex, genetic predisposition, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, heart failure, and possibly excessive exercise. The management of AF involves decisions about rate versus rhythm control. Asymptomatic patients are generally managed with rate control and anticoagulation. Symptomatic patients will desire rhythm control. Rhythm control options are either antiarrhythmic agents or ablation, with each having its own risks and benefits. Ablation of AF has evolved from a rare and complex procedure to a common electrophysiological technique. Selection of patients to undergo ablation is an important aspect of AF care. Patients with the highest success rates of ablation are those with normal structural hearts and paroxysmal AF, although those with congestive heart failure have the greatest potential benefit of the procedure. Although pulmonary vein isolation of any means/energy source is the approach generally agreed on for those with paroxysmal AF, optimal techniques for the ablation of nonparoxysmal AF are not yet clear. Anticoagulation reduces thromboembolic complications; the newer anticoagulants have eased management for both the patient and the cardiologist. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, and possibly excessive exercise) after ablation reduces the odds of recurrent AF and is an important element of care.
心房颤动(AF)是心脏病专家遇到的最常见心律失常,是发病和死亡的主要原因。AF的危险因素包括年龄、男性、遗传易感性、高血压、糖尿病、睡眠呼吸暂停、肥胖、过量饮酒、吸烟、甲状腺功能亢进、肺部疾病、空气污染、心力衰竭,以及可能的过度运动。AF的管理涉及心率控制与节律控制的决策。无症状患者一般采用心率控制和抗凝治疗。有症状的患者则希望进行节律控制。节律控制的选择是抗心律失常药物或消融术,每种方法都有其自身的风险和益处。AF消融术已从一种罕见且复杂的手术演变为一种常见的电生理技术。选择接受消融术的患者是AF治疗的一个重要方面。消融成功率最高的患者是那些心脏结构正常且为阵发性AF的患者,尽管充血性心力衰竭患者从该手术中获益的潜力最大。尽管对于阵发性AF患者,采用任何手段/能量源进行肺静脉隔离是普遍认可的方法,但非阵发性AF消融的最佳技术尚不清楚。抗凝治疗可减少血栓栓塞并发症;新型抗凝剂使患者和心脏病专家的管理都更加轻松。消融术后积极管理可改变的危险因素(高血压、糖尿病、睡眠呼吸暂停、肥胖、过量饮酒、吸烟、甲状腺功能亢进、肺部疾病、空气污染,以及可能的过度运动)可降低AF复发几率,是治疗的重要环节。