Suppr超能文献

惊恐障碍的心理治疗:两个场所的故事

Psychotherapies for Panic Disorder: A Tale of Two Sites.

作者信息

Milrod Barbara, Chambless Dianne L, Gallop Robert, Busch Fredric N, Schwalberg Michael, McCarthy Kevin S, Gross Charles, Sharpless Brian A, Leon Andrew C, Barber Jacques P

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;77(7):927-35. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09507.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy (PFPP), and applied relaxation training (ART) for primary DSM-IV panic disorder with and without agoraphobia in a 2-site randomized controlled trial.

METHOD

201 patients were stratified for site and DSM-IV agoraphobia and depression and were randomized to CBT, PFPP, or ART (19-24 sessions) over 12 weeks in a 2:2:1 ratio at Weill Cornell Medical College (New York, New York) and University of Pennsylvania ("Penn"; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). Any medication was held constant.

RESULTS

Attrition rates were ART, 41%; CBT, 25%; and PFPP, 22%. The most symptomatic patients were more likely to drop out of ART than CBT or PFPP (P = .013). Outcome analyses revealed site-by-treatment interactions in speed of Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) change over time (P = .013). At Cornell, no differences emerged on improvement on the primary outcome, estimated speed of change over time on the PDSS; at Penn, ART (P = .025) and CBT (P = .009) showed greater improvement at treatment termination than PFPP. A site-by-treatment interaction (P = .016) for a priori-defined response (40% PDSS reduction) showed significant differences at Cornell: ART 30%, CBT 65%, PFPP 71% (P = .007), but not at Penn: ART 63%, CBT 60%, PFPP 48% (P = .37). Penn patients were more symptomatic, differed demographically from Cornell patients, had a 7.2-fold greater likelihood of taking medication, and had a 28-fold greater likelihood of taking benzodiazepines. However, these differences did not explain site-by-treatment interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

All treatments substantially improved panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, but patients, particularly the most severely ill, found ART less acceptable. CBT showed the most consistent performance across sites; however, the results for PFPP showed the promise of psychodynamic psychotherapy for this disorder.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00353470.

摘要

目的

在一项双中心随机对照试验中,比较认知行为疗法(CBT)、惊恐聚焦心理动力心理治疗(PFPP)和应用放松训练(ART)对伴有或不伴有广场恐惧症的原发性DSM-IV惊恐障碍的疗效。

方法

201例患者按研究地点、DSM-IV广场恐惧症和抑郁症进行分层,以2:2:1的比例在威尔康奈尔医学院(纽约州纽约市)和宾夕法尼亚大学(“宾大”;宾夕法尼亚州费城)随机分配接受CBT、PFPP或ART治疗(19 - 24节),为期12周。所有药物治疗保持不变。

结果

脱落率分别为:ART组41%;CBT组25%;PFPP组22%。症状最严重的患者退出ART组的可能性高于CBT组或PFPP组(P = 0.013)。结果分析显示,惊恐障碍严重程度量表(PDSS)随时间变化的速度存在治疗地点与治疗方法的交互作用(P = 0.013)。在康奈尔,主要结局指标(PDSS随时间变化的估计速度)的改善情况无差异;在宾大,治疗结束时ART组(P = 0.025)和CBT组(P = 0.009)比PFPP组改善更明显。对于预先定义的反应(PDSS降低40%),治疗地点与治疗方法的交互作用(P = 0.016)在康奈尔显示出显著差异:ART组30%,CBT组65%,PFPP组71%(P = 0.007),但在宾大无差异:ART组63%,CBT组60%,PFPP组48%(P = 0.37)。宾大的患者症状更严重,人口统计学特征与康奈尔的患者不同,服用药物的可能性高7.2倍,服用苯二氮䓬类药物的可能性高28倍。然而,这些差异并不能解释治疗地点与治疗方法的交互作用。

结论

所有治疗方法对伴有或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍均有显著改善,但患者,尤其是病情最严重的患者,觉得ART的可接受性较低。CBT在各研究地点的表现最为一致;然而,PFPP的结果显示了心理动力心理治疗对该疾病的前景。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00353470。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验