Suppr超能文献

使用 CDR-FTLD 检测临床变化:FTLD 与 AD 痴呆的差异。

Detecting clinical change with the CDR-FTLD: differences between FTLD and AD dementia.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;32(9):977-982. doi: 10.1002/gps.4556. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the psychometric properties of the Clinical Dementia Scale-frontotemporal lobar degeneration (CDR-FTLD) psychometric properties using Rasch analysis and its sensitivity distinguishing disease progression between FTLD and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

Of 603 consecutive patients from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center dataset (FTLD = 350; AD = 253), 120 FTLDs were included in a Rasch analysis to verify CDR-FTLD psychometric properties; 483 (FTLD = 230; AD = 253) were included to analyse disease progression, with 195 (FTLD = 82; AD = 113) followed-up (24 months).

RESULTS

The CDR-FTLD demonstrated good consistency, construct and concurrent validity and correlated well with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and disease duration (ps < 0.05). At baseline, FTLD showed greater dementia severity than AD after matched for MMSE and disease duration (p < 0.001). Independent Rasch analyses demonstrated different patterns of progression for FTLD and AD in terms of the domains initially and then subsequently affected with disease progression. At follow-up, although MMSE showed significant changes (p < 0.05), these were greater on the CDR-FTLD (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CDR-FTLD satisfactorily measures dementia severity and change in FTLD, distinguishing disease progression between FTLD and AD, with clear implications for care, prognosis and future clinical trials. © 2016 The Authors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

目的

使用 Rasch 分析研究临床痴呆评定量表-额颞叶变性(CDR-FTLD)的心理计量学特性及其对区分额颞叶痴呆(FTLD)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)疾病进展的敏感性。

方法

从国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心(National Alzheimer Coordinating Center)的数据集(FTLD=350;AD=253)中连续纳入 603 例患者,其中 120 例 FTLD 患者纳入 Rasch 分析以验证 CDR-FTLD 的心理计量学特性;483 例(FTLD=230;AD=253)用于分析疾病进展,其中 195 例(FTLD=82;AD=113)进行了随访(24 个月)。

结果

CDR-FTLD 表现出良好的一致性、结构和同时效度,与简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和疾病持续时间相关性良好(p<0.05)。在基线时,FTLD 在经过 MMSE 和疾病持续时间匹配后,其痴呆严重程度大于 AD(p<0.001)。独立的 Rasch 分析表明,FTLD 和 AD 在初始和随后受疾病进展影响的领域中表现出不同的进展模式。在随访时,尽管 MMSE 显示出显著变化(p<0.05),但 CDR-FTLD 的变化更大(p<0.001)。

结论

CDR-FTLD 能满意地评估 FTLD 的痴呆严重程度和变化,区分 FTLD 和 AD 的疾病进展,对护理、预后和未来的临床试验具有明确的意义。© 2016 作者。国际老年精神病学杂志由约翰威立父子公司出版。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34b/5573995/08c5506dc1f6/GPS-32-977-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验