Yao Y M, Yan H, Zhang Z M, Wu C F, Zhang L, Yang B B
Plastic Surgery Institute, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, China.
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 20;32(7):402-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.07.004.
To investigate the effects of local injection of rabbit adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) on the healing of skin deep partial-thickness scald wound of rabbit.
ADSCs were isolated from adipose tissue of one New Zealand rabbit and then sub-cultured. ADSCs of the third passage were used in the following experiments. Twenty-four rabbits were divided into ADSCs group (n=12) and control group (n=12) according to the random number table, and one deep partial-thickness scald wound with diameter of 5 cm on the two sides of the back near the buttocks was made. From post injury day (PID) 2, 2 mL suspension of EdU-labeled ADSCs with the number of 5×10(5) per mL was subcutaneously injected in wounds of rabbits in ADSCs group, while the rabbits in control group were given 2 mL serum-free DMEM until the wounds were healed. Wound healing processes of rabbits in two groups were observed every day, and the healing time was recorded. On PID 7, 14, 21, and 28, areas of wound of three rabbits in two groups were measured and the healing rates were calculated, respectively. The healed wound tissue was harvested to observe the morphology by HE staining, and the expression of collagen fiber was observed by Masson staining. The distribution of EdU-labeled ADSCs in healed wound tissue on PID 28 was observed by inverted fluorescence microscope. The expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) of healed wound tissue on PID 7, 14, and 21 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data were processed with analysis of variance of factorial design and paired samples t test.
(1) The wound healing time of rabbits in ADSCs group was (19.5±1.1) d post injury, which was significantly shorter than that in control group [(23.3±1.5) d, t=4.50, P<0.05]. On PID 7, wounds of rabbits in two groups were dry with no obvious exudation, and redness and swelling around wounds disappeared gradually, the wound healing rate of rabbits in ADSCs group was (15.1±2.4)%, which was close to that in control group [(13.7±3.1)%, t=1.20, P>0.05]. On PID 14, wounds of rabbits in ADSCs group were dry and scabbed obviously, and the wound healing rate was (73.1±5.7)%, while wounds of rabbits in control group were little scabbed with little exudation, and the wound healing rate was significantly lower than that in ADSCs group [(52.9±5.1)%, t=8.06, P<0.01]. On PID 21, wounds of rabbits in ADSCs group were generally healed, and the wound healing rate was (95.6±3.0)%, while a few wounds still existed in rabbits of control group, and the wound healing rate was significantly lower than that in ADSCs group [(78.6±3.7)%, t=9.73, P<0.01]. On PID 28, wounds of rabbits in two groups were totally healed with the healing rate of 100%, and texture and microvascular responses of healed wound tissue in ADSCs group were better than those in control group. (2) On PID 7, fibroblasts in healed wound tissue of rabbits in two groups were all increased, and there were little vascular and collagen fiber proliferation with no obvious differences. On PID 14, the number of fibroblasts in healed wound tissue of rabbits in ADSCs group was more than that in control group, and the collagen fibers in healed wound tissue of rabbits in ADSCs group were arranged in dense and uniform, while those in control group were sparse and irregular. On PID 21, skin layers were differentiated in healed wound tissue of rabbits in two groups, and collagen fibers in healed wound tissue of rabbits in ADSCs group were still denser than that in control group. On PID 28, newborn skin was well differentiated in healed wound tissue of rabbits in ADSCs group, which was better than that in control group. There were a lot of thick collagen fibers in healed wound tissue of rabbits in two groups, and EdU-labeled ADSCs were involved in skin texture of rabbits in ADSCs group. (3) The expressions of VEGF and EGF in healed wound tissue of rabbits in two groups were similar on PID 7 (with t values respectively 0.70 and 0.91, P values above 0.05), which in ADSCs group were significantly higher than those in control group on PID 14 and 21 (with t values from 2.85 to 4.81, P values below 0.01).
The transplantation of ADSCs can promote the wound healing of skin deep partial-thickness scald wound of rabbit and shorten the wound healing time.
探讨局部注射兔脂肪间充质干细胞(ADSCs)对兔皮肤深Ⅱ度烫伤创面愈合的影响。
从1只新西兰兔的脂肪组织中分离出ADSCs并进行传代培养,取第3代ADSCs用于后续实验。将24只兔按随机数字表法分为ADSCs组(n = 12)和对照组(n = 12),在兔臀部附近背部两侧制作直径5 cm的深Ⅱ度烫伤创面。自伤后第2天起,ADSCs组兔创面皮下注射每毫升含5×10(5)个的EdU标记的ADSCs悬液2 mL,对照组兔创面注射2 mL无血清DMEM,直至创面愈合。每天观察两组兔创面愈合过程,记录愈合时间。于伤后第7、14、21和28天,分别测量两组3只兔的创面面积并计算愈合率。收取愈合创面组织,行HE染色观察形态,Masson染色观察胶原纤维表达情况。用倒置荧光显微镜观察伤后第28天愈合创面组织中EdU标记的ADSCs分布。采用酶联免疫吸附测定法检测伤后第7、14和21天愈合创面组织中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和表皮生长因子(EGF)的表达。数据采用析因设计方差分析和配对样本t检验进行处理。
(1)ADSCs组兔伤后创面愈合时间为(19.5±1.1)d,明显短于对照组[(23.3±1.5)d,t = 4.50,P < 0.05]。伤后第7天,两组兔创面干燥,无明显渗出,创面周围红肿逐渐消退,ADSCs组兔创面愈合率为(15.1±2.4)%,与对照组[(13.7±3.1)%]接近(t = 1.20,P > 0.05)。伤后第14天,ADSCs组兔创面干燥且明显结痂,创面愈合率为(73.1±5.7)%,而对照组兔创面少量结痂,有少量渗出,创面愈合率明显低于ADSCs组[(52.9±5.1)%,t = 8.06,P < 0.01]。伤后第21天,ADSCs组兔创面基本愈合,创面愈合率为(95.6±3.0)%,而对照组兔仍有少量创面未愈合,创面愈合率明显低于ADSCs组[(78.6±3.7)%,t = 9.73,P < 0.01]。伤后第28天,两组兔创面均完全愈合,愈合率均为100%,ADSCs组愈合创面组织的质地和微血管反应优于对照组。(2)伤后第7天,两组兔愈合创面组织中的成纤维细胞均增多,血管和胶原纤维增生较少,差异无统计学意义。伤后第14天,ADSCs组兔愈合创面组织中的成纤维细胞数量多于对照组,ADSCs组兔愈合创面组织中的胶原纤维排列致密、均匀,而对照组的稀疏、不规则。伤后第21天,两组兔愈合创面组织均有皮肤各层分化,ADSCs组兔愈合创面组织中的胶原纤维仍比对照组致密。伤后第28天,ADSCs组兔愈合创面组织新生皮肤分化良好,优于对照组。两组兔愈合创面组织均有大量粗大胶原纤维,ADSCs组中EdU标记的ADSCs参与了兔皮肤组织的形成。(3)伤后第7天,两组兔愈合创面组织中VEGF和EGF的表达相近(t值分别为0.70和0.91,P值均大于0.05),伤后第14天和21天,ADSCs组中VEGF和EGF的表达均明显高于对照组(t值为2.85~4.81,P值均小于0.01)。
ADSCs移植可促进兔皮肤深Ⅱ度烫伤创面愈合,缩短创面愈合时间。