Everard Eoin M, Harrison Andrew J, Lyons Mark
1Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; and 2Department of Sports and Finance, Limerick Institute of Technology, Limerick, Ireland.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 May;31(5):1265-1272. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001582.
Everard, EM, Harrison, AJ, and Lyons, M. Examining the relationship between the functional movement screen and the landing error scoring system in an active, male collegiate population. J Strength Cond Res 31(5): 1265-1272, 2017-In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on movement screening as the principal aspect of preparticipation testing. Two of the most common movement screening tools are the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS). Several studies have examined the reliability and validity of these tools, but so far, there have been no studies comparing the results of these 2 screening tools against each other. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between FMS scores and LESS scores. Ninety-eight male college athletes actively competing in sport (Gaelic games, soccer, athletics, boxing/mixed martial arts, Olympic weightlifting) participated in the study and performed the FMS and LESS screens. Both the 21-point and 100-point scoring systems were used to score the FMS. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship between the 2 screening scores. The results showed a significant moderate correlation between FMS and LESS scores (rho 100 and 21 point = -0.528; -0.487; p < 0.001). In addition, r values of 0.26 and 0.23 indicate a poor shared variance between the 2 screens. The results indicate that performing well in one of the screens does not necessarily equate to performing well in the other. This has practical implications as it highlights that both screens may assess different movement patterns and should not be used as a substitute for each other.
埃弗拉德、E.M.、哈里森、A.J.和莱昂斯、M.：研究在活跃的男性大学生群体中功能性动作筛查与落地误差评分系统之间的关系。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(5)：1265 - 1272，2017年 - 近年来，运动筛查作为参与前测试的主要方面受到越来越多的关注。两种最常见的运动筛查工具是功能性动作筛查（FMS）和落地误差评分系统（LESS）。多项研究检验了这些工具的信度和效度，但到目前为止，尚无研究将这两种筛查工具的结果相互比较。因此，本研究的目的是确定FMS分数与LESS分数之间的关系。98名积极参加体育运动（盖尔式足球、足球、田径、拳击/综合格斗、奥运会举重）的男性大学生运动员参与了该研究，并进行了FMS和LESS筛查。FMS采用21分制和100分制进行评分。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数来确定两种筛查分数之间的关系。结果显示FMS和LESS分数之间存在显著的中度相关性（rho(100分制和21分制)= -0.528；-0.487；p < 0.001）。此外，r值为0.26和0.23表明两种筛查之间的共同方差较差。结果表明，在其中一种筛查中表现良好并不一定等同于在另一种筛查中表现良好。这具有实际意义，因为它突出表明两种筛查可能评估不同的运动模式，不应相互替代使用。
