• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生运动员功能性动作筛查的析因效度及性别间测量不变性

Functional Movement Screen Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance Across Sex Among Collegiate Student-Athletes.

作者信息

Gnacinski Stacy L, Cornell David J, Meyer Barbara B, Arvinen-Barrow Monna, Earl-Boehm Jennifer E

机构信息

Integrative Health Care and Performance Unit, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Dec;30(12):3388-3395. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001448.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001448
PMID:27870697
Abstract

Gnacinski, SL, Cornell, DJ, Meyer, BB, Arvinen-Barrow, M, and Earl-Boehm, JE. Functional Movement Screen factorial validity and measurement invariance across sex among collegiate student-athletes. J Strength Cond Res 30(12): 3388-3395, 2016-The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a screening tool used to evaluate functional movement quality and subsequent musculoskeletal injury risk. Despite recent research on the factorial validity of the FMS, no confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has been conducted to examine measurement invariance across sex among student-athletes. The primary purpose of the current study was to confirm the factor structure of the FMS measurement model in a collegiate student-athlete population. It was hypothesized that the 1-factor model would demonstrate better model fit than the recently proposed 2-factor model. The secondary purpose of the study was to examine FMS measurement invariance across sex using the previously identified measurement model. It was hypothesized that FMS measurement invariance would hold across sex. Male (n = 88) and female (n = 88) collegiate student-athletes completed FMS screening during the off-season. Factorial validity was examined using CFA procedures, and model parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood estimation. Measurement invariance was examined by comparison of fit indices between hierarchically constrained models. Results revealed support for both the 1- and the 2-factor models; however, the 2-factor model failed to fit the data significantly better than the 1-factor model. Results also indicated that measurement invariance did not hold across sex, indicating that the FMS sum score construct is not measured equivalently in male and female populations. Collectively, results provide evidence for the use of the unidimensional FMS sum score among collegiate student-athletes, yet prompt caution because it relates to the evaluation of sex differences in sum or movement pattern scores.

摘要

格纳辛斯基,SL;康奈尔,DJ;迈耶,BB;阿尔维宁 - 巴罗,M;厄尔 - 博姆,JE。大学生运动员功能性动作筛查的因子效度及性别间测量不变性。《力量与体能研究杂志》30(12): 3388 - 3395,2016年 - 功能性动作筛查(FMS)是一种用于评估功能性动作质量及后续肌肉骨骼损伤风险的筛查工具。尽管近期有关于FMS因子效度的研究,但尚未进行验证性因子分析(CFA)来检验大学生运动员中性别间的测量不变性。本研究的主要目的是在大学生运动员群体中确认FMS测量模型的因子结构。研究假设单因素模型比最近提出的双因素模型具有更好的模型拟合度。本研究的次要目的是使用先前确定的测量模型检验FMS在性别间的测量不变性。研究假设FMS测量不变性在性别间成立。88名男性和88名女性大学生运动员在休赛期完成了FMS筛查。使用CFA程序检验因子效度,并使用最大似然估计法估计模型参数。通过比较分层约束模型之间的拟合指数来检验测量不变性。结果显示对单因素模型和双因素模型均有支持;然而,双因素模型对数据的拟合并未显著优于单因素模型。结果还表明测量不变性在性别间不成立,这表明FMS总分结构在男性和女性群体中的测量方式并不等同。总体而言,研究结果为在大学生运动员中使用一维FMS总分提供了证据,但在涉及总分或动作模式得分的性别差异评估时需谨慎。

相似文献

1
Functional Movement Screen Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance Across Sex Among Collegiate Student-Athletes.大学生运动员功能性动作筛查的析因效度及性别间测量不变性
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Dec;30(12):3388-3395. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001448.
2
Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Perceived Susceptibility to Sport Injury scale.运动损伤感知易感性量表的因素效度和测量不变性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Jul;27(7):754-761. doi: 10.1111/sms.12681. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
The Functional Movement Screen as a Predictor of Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes.《功能性运动筛查(FMS)在预测美国大学生体育协会二级联赛运动员损伤中的作用》。
J Athl Train. 2018 Jan;53(1):29-34. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-528-15. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
4
Performance Comparison of Student-Athletes and General College Students on the Functional Movement Screen and the Y Balance Test.学生运动员与普通大学生在功能性动作筛查和Y平衡测试中的表现比较
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Aug;29(8):2296-303. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000906.
5
Predicting Musculoskeletal Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes From Asymmetries and Individual-Test Versus Composite Functional Movement Screen Scores.根据不对称性以及个体测试与综合功能性动作筛查分数预测美国国家大学体育协会二级运动员的肌肉骨骼损伤
J Athl Train. 2016 Apr;51(4):276-82. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.07. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen and a Novel Basketball Mobility Test as an Injury Prediction Tool for Collegiate Basketball Players.评估功能性运动筛查和一种新的篮球活动能力测试作为大学生篮球运动员的损伤预测工具。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jun;33(6):1589-1600. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001944.
7
Injury history, sex, and performance on the functional movement screen and Y balance test.损伤史、性别以及在功能性动作筛查和Y平衡测试中的表现。
J Athl Train. 2015 May;50(5):475-85. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.6.02. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Examining the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen and the Landing Error Scoring System in an Active, Male Collegiate Population.在活跃的男性大学生群体中研究功能性动作筛查与落地误差评分系统之间的关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 May;31(5):1265-1272. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001582.
9
Functional movement screen differences between male and female secondary school athletes.男女中学运动员之间的功能性动作筛查差异
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Apr;29(4):1098-106. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000733.
10
Little associations exist between the three commonly used functional screening tests in collegiate athletes.在大学生运动员中,三种常用的功能筛查测试之间几乎没有关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64518-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Functional Movement Screens Predict Body Composition Changes after Resistance Training?功能性动作筛查能否预测抗阻训练后的身体成分变化?
Sports Med Int Open. 2025 Jun 24;9:a25564182. doi: 10.1055/a-2556-4182. eCollection 2025.
2
Lower extremity functional performance tests and their measurement properties in athletes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.运动员下肢功能表现测试及其测量特性:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Jun 8;11(2):e002389. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002389. eCollection 2025.
3
Predictive Utility of the Functional Movement Screen and Y-Balance Test: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
功能性动作筛查和Y平衡测试的预测效用:当前证据与未来方向
Sports (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;13(2):46. doi: 10.3390/sports13020046.
4
The Development and Content of Movement Quality Assessments in Athletic Populations: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.运动员群体运动质量评估的发展与内容:一项系统评价和多层次荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2025 Jan 23;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00813-0.
5
Adapted Training to Boost Upper Body Sensorimotor Control and Daily Living Functionality in Visually Impaired Baseball Players.改编训练以提升视障棒球运动员的上半身感觉运动控制和日常生活功能。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 15;60(7):1136. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071136.
6
Little associations exist between the three commonly used functional screening tests in collegiate athletes.在大学生运动员中,三种常用的功能筛查测试之间几乎没有关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64518-2.
7
Influence of Body Composition on Functional Movement Among Police Officers.身体成分对警察功能性运动的影响。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Mar 1;17(4):418-428. doi: 10.70252/GECN7769. eCollection 2024.
8
Sex-related Anthropometrics in a Lower-Body Mobility Assessment Among Professional Soccer Athletes.职业足球运动员下肢运动能力评估中的性别相关人体测量学
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 2;17(3):474-482. doi: 10.26603/001c.32595. eCollection 2022.
9
Reliability and Repeatability of ACL Quick Check: A Methodology for on Field Lower Limb Joint Kinematics and Kinetics Assessment in Sport Applications.ACL 快速检查的可靠性和可重复性:一种在运动应用中进行现场下肢关节运动学和动力学评估的方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;22(1):259. doi: 10.3390/s22010259.
10
Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) in Identifying Active Females Who are Prone to Injury. A Systematic Review.功能性动作筛查(FMS)在识别易受伤活跃女性中的应用评估。一项系统评价。
Sports Med Open. 2021 Nov 22;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00380-0.